Kenya Airways Boeing 777 Takeoff from Nairobi
Loading...
9,874
Loading...
Uploader Comments (samueldethierry)
see all
All Comments (23)
-
beautiful
-
@skbenergy It certainly is! You should check out a Virgin A340 departing, uses almost all of it! The 777s are powerhouses which don't need it (on this flight only 50% of the runway length was actually used). When BA flew 747s into Nairobi (until 2009 when Virgin started competing on the route) about 75% of the runway would be used for takeoffs to London
-
@samueldethierry thats one long ass runway lol :)
-
Nice video! I agree, I love it when a plane "breaks through" the cloud barrier revealing beautiful blue sky! Probably my favorite part of flying.
-
I like this clip, thanks for uploading!!
-
nice one
Loading...
This is a full power take-off.
raykrislianggi 2 months ago
@raykrislianggi That's incorrect. SOPs from JKIA stipulate 90% thrust must be used as a minimum, with a/c SOP restricting use of thrust above 95% to SEPs only. Given the load factor it's likely to be nearer to 90% thrust than 95% thrust.
samueldethierry 2 months ago 2
@samueldethierry Really? I said that because the blades are spinning faster and sound pitch is different than normal Trent 800 take-off. Usually the take-off power is not the same as this.
raykrislianggi 2 months ago
@raykrislianggi They certainly are 'spinning faster than normal' because as I mentioned above SOP from JKIA demands minimum 90% thrust whereas an airport at sea level would have an SOP minimum of 70%. Relying on sound pitch and engine blade spin is very unreliable as they can also be affected by a variety of environmental factors, air density etc. In short, a 'full power' take off would only occur in an emergency go around.
samueldethierry 2 months ago