Illegitimate Pleasures

Any pleasure that jeopardizes the sacred right of another person is an illegitimate pleasure. Ravi Zacharias shares a regret from his own life due to an illegitimate pleasure.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Joe Gibbs
• Game Plan for Life
• Ravi Zacharias
• pleasure

[brennan2185]

@AHMEDBULAXUBEY: And you've come to this very conclusive (and rash) assumption based on one two minute and nineteen second video?

[AHMEDBULAXUBEY]

Ravi is a pimp not a pastor he traveled half his life for what telling us about his life and his family. If you ain't talking about. God you ain't talking about nothing

[jdaddy2323]

o woops i thot that said "got it"...or something...in that case lemme rephrase...you are asserting all theists are idiots for claiming to know something while u assert that God did NOT do it...thats still an assertion that you have to prove...good luck..."o but i dont claim to know"...really? you seem pretty sure of urself

[jdaddy2323]

@MomoTheBellyDancer So you say we should just throw hands in the air every time we don't know something and shout "GODDIDIT"? why not...thats what youre doing... on one hand you assert that theists are idiots for claiming to know anything then on the other hand you claim to know that we cant know anything... and the point is it cant be tested scientifically...not that it cant be supported by evidence. science is not all...not even close.

[TheAxis456]

@vdizhoor I agree that not everything in the Bible should be taken literally. But there are large portions of the bible which are historica. Peer review does not make something absolute though, which is what I was trying to say. Peer review by evil people brings about evil acts. Who's to say they are really wrong if there is no absolute? Right, but before the Big Bang there was no matter, time or space. Meaning that something which transcends time, matter and space created the universe.

[vdizhoor]

@TheAxis456

What Ravi says is good, but it does not mean the Bible should be taken literally. Personal truths are of different qualities than scientific. Ultimately peer review removes the self-centered views of individuals, and leaves that which is more true - so you could say that science is "godly" :)

The nature of the universe is transformation, not creation. The painter transforms thoughts and paints into a painting. @Big Bang is not nothing. It is the oldest time that we can describe.

[9739460341]

@MomoTheBellyDancer ignorance is bliss... :)

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

@TheAxis456

"What is your theory then? "

I don't know. That's good enough for me. I'd rather accept that I lack knowledge than that I make up answers that are wrong.

[TheAxis456]

@MomoTheBellyDancer What is your theory then? There was nothing and then out of nothing exploded something?

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

@TheAxis456

". Before the universe there was no space/time/matter, so scientifically how can one test what is not material?"

So you say we should just throw hands in the air every time we don't know something and shout "GODDIDIT". With that attitude you wouldn't even have the computer you're typing on now.

"This job is for the philosopher."

Philosophy has a very lousy track record when it comes to finding out how nature works.