Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (218)
-
@razegfx I have never heard anyone with a better interpretation than Gilels, this is surreal, pure passion and musicality and yes it is his golden bel-canto tone :-) I also love Weissenberg's interpretation (it's on YT)
-
I bet that piano was sore afterwards :/
-
@9989126
-
@razegfx You know, I really don't care the tone itself too much... Here is too much banging and "tone", and a few real Rachmaninov. Of course, I like Richter much more. (not sure about gavrilov)
-
i think i have heard better interpretations of the piece (or at least one's that i prefer...gavrilov, richter, etc.), but i've never heard anybody with gilel's tone - so powerful and clear. i bet even the ushers outside of the recital hall could feel it.
-
@gammypage Sucks that you see it that way, music is based upon emotion, and emotion is rarely coherent.
-
I don't like this piece... it's incoherent.
-
i don't think he plays it as well as richter whose performance inspired one of my abstract films
-
look at the suggestions on the right, watch kissin play this. k bye.
-
so beautiful this middle part,,,
Gilels is the Bomb.
logman135 1 year ago 13
Pause and drag to 3:06
lol at dracula in the 1st row
9989126 7 months ago 9