Dimitri Khalezov | 9/11 THE THIRD TRUTH | Part 1/2

http://www.911thology.com
http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com
http://www.nuclear-demolition.com

September Clues
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWl8mUSDIwU

Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition scheme, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition scheme). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
- Dimitri Khalezov background
- Planes and explosions
- Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
- Nuclear detonations explained
- WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 911
• dimitri
• khalezov
• nuclear
• wtc
• conspiracy
• 9/11
• demolition
• charges
• decrypted
• entschlüsselt
• no
• plane
• fake
• tv
• ritual
• pentagon
• missle
• doomsday
• ground
• zero
• clues
• lies
• witness
• jochen
• scholz
• never
• seen
• before
• most
• important
• south
• north
• tower
• ufo
• white
• dusk
• dust
• manipulation

[IranContraScumDid911]

There is only one truth ..... the third truth is not it. There were no nukes on 9/11.

[TheRangersLegend]

@IranContraScumDid911 Tell us then.....what is the truth?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@TheRangers The buildings turned to dust at a decent rate near freefall. A nuke at the base could not and would not create that effect. A nuke is one big explosion, uncontrolled. There are many explosions, not just one. The videos, eyewitnesses, and news reports all confirm this throughout the day. Multiple explosions after the towers collapsed for 1/2 hour. Multiple nukes? We all know how they demolish buildings, no need for some science fiction theories. Been to my channel?

[TheRangersLegend]

@IranContraScumDid911 Whatever the deal with 9/11, the truth will never come out. Whatever it may be. All we have is opinions.

[Ghenghy]

@TheRangersLegend 9/11 simply does not happen without the cooperation and foreknowledge of the government and military. The military was on stand down that day and those orders came directly from Rumsfeld and Cheney, that is a fact. You cannot fire missiles at the fucking Pentagon without setting off an immediate chain reaction, that didnt happen. Khalezov says the NWO ordered it, OK, well who the fuck do you think we report too? Of course Bush knew, its ludicrous to think otherwise!

[Ghenghy]

OK, that makes perfect sense. But this guy is full of shit when he says the government was a "victim" and wasn't involved. It could NOT have happened without their involvement! Of course it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, but if it was launched in an "attack" the where is the goddamn retaliation? Who do we retaliate against, OURSELVES??? The military was on total stand down that day and the WH lied about no planes at Langley, the fucking Patriot Act was on the House floor on 9/14 . Lies!

[krisreckner]

Hes reading off the card!

[IranContraScumDid911]

@man1192803 You are looking for a star, a person to believe in. Dumbass. Try using the laws of motion, written by Isaac Newton 400 years ago and never disproven. Thats as credible as you can get. The laws of motion alone disprove this idiot theory. Case study and engineering tells us how they demolish buildings. We see the effects, properties, and results we should from explosives planted throughout the building. The high velocity dust and ejecta should tell a troll like you more than one blast

[man1192803]

@IranContraScumDid911

Lol, who the heck are you?

Why do you think you have ANY credibility on this issue?

Identify yourself and give us your version on TV. Otherwhise you're just talking SHIT.

This guy was a nuclear intelligence officer for crying out loud, and you are questioning his professionalism?

Bye bye naive loser.

For people who want to know who are behind the 9/11 'truth' movement:

/watch?v=xbY5_qtz83M

They're all CIA/NSA employees who distorted the truth.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@mel8630 In science we take the most obvious and focus on that first. How do they demolish buildings in reality? I can EASILY disprove this theory. The buildings blew into dust within a second of freefall speed. When you have a building falling and crushing down the energy available is mass and velocity. Since the mass turns to dust we should see a velocity loss equal to the energy consumed. There is little velocity loss meaning there was no crush down. Many small blasts not one biggie

[mel8630]

I'm not saying I think this guy is correct though, because I haven't even watched the entire video. I have a hard time wanting to waste 4 hours of my life, just to hear this guy's version. It's not like it's a big secret that the government lies about damn near everything. I've got my own personal grievance with the governments lies. I want the truth about aliens and bigfoot dammit!!!

[mel8630]

Anyway the point is they wouldn't have been able to smuggle the amount of C4 or any other conventional compound in order to level those buildings onto those planes. But they could however smuggle enough nuclear type compound, because it doesn't require near as much....

[mel8630]

So not only would they require a very high amount of conventional explosive compound, but they would also have to be strategically placed. Unfortunately I can't explain everything I want to due to the limitations of these comment sizes.

[mel8630]

@IranContraScumDid911 , you do realize that not all nuclear bombs are created equal right? The size of a small nuclear device could much more easily be smuggled onto an aircraft, than a conventional explosive compound device. Do you realize how much conventional explosive it would take in order to take out those towers? Those towers were built so they wouldn't collapse in the event some sort of catastrophic event happened. So not only would they require a very high amount

[ludmilalloyd]

@IranContraScumDid911 And you are scienist of.... geology, thermonuclears, anything??? No?

Look at the pics of hole after remains of the ruins were taken out. See the lines on the groundmassess going by circles?

It was granite before..Melting temperature is 1215 - 1260 °C. Go to Central Park study how granite looks, there are open granite rocks out there.

Only nuclear explosions could melt it & change the structure of its porphiric texture.