Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Q&A: How can Christianity be both Monotheistic and Trinitarian? Tim Keller

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,144
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 23, 2009

This is a free download from redeemer.com

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Sanctum85)

  • I really don't think its that confusing. 3 personalities in one essence. I really liked the last bit too on historical arguments that show greater problems with non-trinitarian monothiesm.

  • @kwalityc we must be careful, it's not 3 personalities, it's 3 persons...

  • @Sanctum85

    your words 'we must be careful, it's not 3 personalities, it's 3 persons'

    to EXPLAIN when did the word ONE came to mean MORE THAN ONE SINGULAR?

    For I remember very well the humiliation at being taken to the infant class to be 'shown' what the word ONE meant when I had crossed out my mistake with '3' lines instead of the '1' line my teacher had told us to do!

    I look forward to your reply

    Kat >^.^<

  • @MayIPleaseAskYou Thanks for asking and I apologize for my delay in the response, but I don't usually monitor the comments on my videos. it's very time consuming. Correct me if I misunderstood your concern. What makes a person a person is the ability to reason, communicate. that which makes it distinct from an animal or thing. By definition it's a self-conscious or rational being. And it has nothing to do with physicality.

  • @Sanctum85 Personality is what a person can have. But it does not define its personhood.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @FillTheirVoid Remember, Jesus is the Word of God. Deut 18:18, John 14:10. His words are not His own, though He can still refer to Himself. Rev 1:1 reinforces the point that Jesus is passing on a message from God. Again, He was made better than the angels because God made Him Lord of all. Don't resort to eisegesis; those who believe in Christ are sons of God just as much as He is.

  • @OneTruthFinder

    So is it then your contention that men shall praise Christ their savior - praise which apparently only belongs to God who is the only savior?

    Isaiah 43:11 / Titus 2:13

    It seems to me that Christ is given the same adoration that the Father is, because He is God.

  • @OneTruthFinder

    So when Christ said "I AM The First and the Last" He wasn't speaking about Himself? What about when He says I am He who was dead? Is He speaking about someone else there?

    Yes, He is higher than the angels - because He is the Son of God.

  • @FillTheirVoid "Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself." Phil 3:21

    I'm sure there are many more scriptures I could present which prove God shares His glory, but that ought to suffice.

  • @FillTheirVoid Read the context of Is 42:8. God is saying that He won't share His glory with any other nation besides Israel. To interpret this scripture in the eisegetical manner you do would mean serious problems when we come across John 17:22:

    "And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them."

    And 2 Cor 3:18:

    "But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord."

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more