David vs. Goliath

..... more about evolution.

David berlinsky takes on Barry lynn (ACLU magnet)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• david
• barry
• lynn

[YHWHisSovereign]

Berlinski is correct, as long as there are gaps, the fossil record does not support evolution. Unfortunately, for the diehard evolutionist, their imagination takes care of any gaps.

[TJae1]

@YHWHisSovereign ~ :) 

[TJae1]

@warren52nz ~  How could Jonah survive three days in the belly of a “whale”? Via: 1.Natural process 2.Miracelous 3. Resurrection ~ Matt 12:40

[TJae1]

The Creation Model of origins is more “scientific” and less “religious” that the Evolution Model, because its predictions are supported by scientific observation (without any reference to the Bible whatsoever), rather than assumed despite empirical evidence. Neither the Creation Model nor the Evolution Model can be scientifically proven to be true since both concepts R beyond the reach of the scientific method & both views deal w/ singularities (ult.origins) which must be

accepted by faith.

[mehico33]

As if any serious biologist relies on fossil evidence, we have no right to expect any fossils at all. In fact the fossil record could be powerful evidence against evolution if only one single specimen could be found in the "wrong place". Eg. fossil rabbits in the cambrian.

[l337pwnage]

@YHWHisSovereign And until god appears in front of every human and they accept that he is real, then he does not exist either. thanx for playing. ^_^

[dsaxton1]

@YHWHisSovereign LOL, what?  So you would need to have the remains of every living thing that has ever existed to have evidence for evolution? That's totally asinine. When there are gaps in the evidence, we have handy things like interpolation and basic reasoning skills.

[johaneriksandberg]

@periechontology I don't think you know what you mean, could be that you are only trolling too...

[periechontology]

@johaneriksandberg

What kind of explanations are you talking about (by the way, i really don't think you understood what i said, and whether you did or not i'll be able to determine by your answer to this question).

[johaneriksandberg]

@TJae1 Such nonsense it's comical.

[johaneriksandberg]

@periechontology Or in short "it has gaps therefore it doesn't support evolution" wich is what I thought he meant and it is what he meant that he doesn't take the explanations for the gaps into account just proves he's meerly trying to twist it without looking at the whole picture, that is not a logical approach unless you're trying to reach a predetermined conclusion when examining something.

[gregrutz]

@YHWHisSovereign They filled the gaps, now you say there are twice as many gaps. The fossils record has gaps but it does not follow that evolution is false. And They have many transitional fossils.

[gregrutz]

@periechontology We see the process of evolution in the fossil record. Scientists try to explain what we find and call it The Theory of Evolution.

[gregrutz]

The fossil record has some gaps, that does not mean Evolution didn't happen.