Mika Hakkinen crash in Adelaide '95
Top Comments
All Comments (210)
-
@iTriGGletyi bits of suspension on his wheel.
-
@artturi98 I'm not convinced; after Ratzenberger's death there were many calls for safety and Senna's death only really sealed the deal, but I'm sure new safety measures were coming whether or not Senna had died.
-
@artturi98 no, because the timeline would be totally diferent.
-
wow,last 5 sec for us are 5 years for Mika
-
@Westwoooooooood yeah its not very hard i mean he can use it but slower or something i dont know^^
-
To be fair, you added the fact "his right face is since then half disabled". I never knew that!
-
@Westwoooooooood damn didnt saw your comment sry ^^
-
@artturi98 actually without a tracheotomy from sid watkins häkkinen would be dead.
his right face is since then half disabled. thank god we have watkins....
-
@artturi98 Miki needed HANS deviced for this bad accident.
-
@artturi98 Wrong. A wheel killed Senna. IE thats why wheel teathers were introduced and higher driver side body work.
Please know your F1 history.
@pekir18 If Ayrton Senna would have survived, Häkkinen would be dead. After Senna's death (Imola 1994) they made F1 cars stronger, that nobody dies anymore. And no-one has died after Ayrton Senna, that made Häkkinen survive. Think about it.
artturi98 4 months ago 36
@artturi98
Barely. The car did its job, granted. But no HANS meant that his head still took extraordinary force, like Ratzenberger for example. Sid Watkins had to give Hakkinen a tracheotomy, this is what saved his life.
Westwoooooooood 2 months ago 21