Copenhagen will host experts and world leaders in December to discuss what to do with climate change. And while they'll seek ways to battle greenhouse emissions, the scientific community is split over global warming.
After hackers allegedly exposed one of the most respected climate research institutes as having defrauded the world in regards to global warming, the shock subsides and the experts start to weigh in.
The data, real data over the last 1,000, 10,000 and 1,000,000 years shows there is no relation between carbon dioxide and world temperatures or climate extremes and now we can see that the people in charge of the data have been fiddling it, said Piers Corbyn, independent meteorologist from the Weather Action organization.
The e-mails stolen from the University of East Anglia's servers reportedly show that scientists have been manipulating data to support the theory of global warming. What makes this recent development so scandalous is that entire governments have developed significant policy based on the idea that global warming is a fact. The investigation into the validity of the damming cyber-information is still ongoing, which has many in the green movement sticking to their guns.
But now with confidence inspired by the infamous computer hackers, those against the idea of global warming have found a new forum, giving weight to the opposite view.
The temperature is not in any way affected by the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, said Proffessor Oleg Sorokhtin from the Institute of Oceanology at the Russian Academy of Sciences. The more carbon dioxide there is, the better it is for humanity, and I will explain why. Carbon dioxide is like bread for green plants, so agriculture gains significantly if there's more of it.
Now publicly included in the debate is data that suggests the world's average temperature has even decreased over the past 7 years, calling into question the need for current carbon emission standards.
"The Kyoto Protocol is a bluff, because it connects carbon dioxide and consumption, said Professor Andrey Kapitsa from the Geography Department at Moscow State University. Every country has a limit of how many cars it can have and so on. That is total nonsense. Americans were right in petitioning everyone not to sign the protocol.
AHAHAHAHAHA FOX NEWS TYPO!! FLIMAKER? what the hell is that?
predz23 1 year ago
Kiss my ass Ed!!
therhythmicmenace 2 years ago