Mirror Evolution : The Ultimate Disproof

Subscribe to Real Science & Reason: http://www.youtube.com/NatCen4ScienceEd
http://www.youtube.com/molecularbiovids
http://www.youtube.com/chattiestspike2
http://www.youtube.com/philhellenes
http://www.youtube.com/aronra
http://www.youtube.com/thunderf00t
http://www.youtube.com/cdk007
http://www.youtube.com/potholer54
http://www.youtube.com/potholer54debunks
http://www.youtube.com/shanedk
http://www.youtube.com/andromedaswake
http://www.youtube.com/extantdodo
http://www.youtube.com/DonExodus2
http://www.youtube.com/c0nc0rdance

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Carl
• Sagan
• cosmos
• the
• atheist
• experience
• einstein
• special
• relativity
• god
• christianity
• christian
• apologetics
• Astronomy
• Astrophysics
• Astronomers
• evolution
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• DNA
• genetics
• fossil
• record
• transitional
• forms
• ben
• stein
• charles
• darwin
• debate
• richard
• dawkins
• michael
• behe
• ken
• miller
• kent
• hovind
• ham

[TheScienceFoundation]

@jesse8857 No, by looking at the actual data as opposed to trying to claim that a paper on radiation induced mutations is relevant when talking about mutation rates in general.

[TheScienceFoundation]

@jesse8857 No, the crux of my argumentation is that 1: You made up mutation rates out of nothing (the actual research has shown the harmful mutation rate in humans is about 3 out of 125) and 2: The paper you cited was in regards to mutation rates due to radiation, which has nothing to do with anything.

Whether he's published works is irrelevant, he hasn't published on genetic entropy because it's not science.

[grexory]

@jesse8857

If you are in fact right, and the evidence you're claiming is testable, verifiable and correct there's a nobel prize and front cover of Time magazine waiting, not 137 views and more dislikes than likes, on youtube.

I know that if the fact of Evolution was falsifiable and I could prove it, I wouldn't be posting propaganda videos on youtube, I'd be taking on the scientific community and claiming my awards, research money and fame!

Get with the program - put up, or shut up.

[jesse8857]

I don't want to start 100 arguments with the science foundation [sic], but everyone must know that his whole crux of the argument "debunking this video" was the fact that Sanford didn't publish in peer review. This is an outright lie - he has published dozens of articles in top secular journals, and he meticulously documents his information in his book from other peer reviewed papers (even though his caliber is such that this is not needed). That's all I have to say.

[jesse8857]

@grexory "all of the points raised in these videos are subsequently razed upon looking at the facts" No, by looking on the false interpretation of the facts from evolutionists.

[odinata]

@Orenotter

How about you prove that supernatural beings cured your friend.

And by the way, no one cares if you don't believe the scientific facts.

Science will be just fine without you....

[Orenotter]

There was a woman who could barely walk with braces due to severe abuse. Her skin was covered in scars and her muscle tissue had huge gouges. She received a miraculous healing. She no longer needs braces, her scars are gone and her muscles filled in, all over the course of hours. I know that God the creator is real because things like this happen every day. You prove to me that my friend was never healed and I'll consider evolution.

[IoEstasCedonta]

Taken as written, there's no reason we should have survived six thousand years...