Brothers Karamazov: Session 7: The Grand Inquisitor

The Grand Inquisitor and the Question of Evil.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Suzanne
• Ross
• mimetic
• theory
• Rene
• Girard
• Brothers
• Karamazov
• Fyodor
• Dostoevsky
• good
• and
• evil

[WeAreJustDreamingNow]

An excellent example of why it's always far better to read the actual literary text first hand than risk listening to this sort of inaccurate, primary school rehash.

[raventelevision]

@WeAreJustDreamingNow Hi. Can you please give examples as opposed to simple accusation? If you are interested in having more of a conversation, check out Rene Girard's book on Dostoevsky "Resurrection from the Underground". Thanks.

[bielenka]

thank you for your videos, these are a great resourse to use while reading the book!

[iamivantoo]

Nice discussion. Only wonder how sure Dostoyevsky is that the "cure" is a "proper God relationship." It seems that the author leaves the answer or cure to suffering to be open to interpretation or without and answer at all possibly. Thanks for posting.

[adrainn]

I really enjoyed your interpretation of this chapter. I'm halfway through the novel now, but i wasn't patient enough to wait to finish the book to hear what other people's interpretation is. It's such an amazing parable, with way too much to grasp in one pass over. I'll keep watching your videos as i go along w/ the rest of the novel. Thanks!

[Spingo2699]

Interesting take. I think we may have had dissimilar translations. I read the boy wounded the dog on purpose. I didn't get the idea, any of the text, that Ivan's illness was that related to his disproportion to his moral problem. It seemed more chemical, of legitimate insanity. I find it odd you didn't focus more on the Grand Inquisitor (your actual title). Also, from what I read, the Cardinal spoke only of spiritual freedom, not freewill.

[ulitseful]

@WeAreJustDreamingNow Please, tell as all what do you think about Brothers Karamazov. Do you have any interpretation?

[Cait711]

I love this! I'm going to look for more of your analyses.

[larryboy1995]

@iamivantoo He is not sure at all about the solution to the paradox he formulates in the first part. Actually, as dark as what is covered here sounds, this book was Dostoyevsky's most optimistic book, and his most most difficult to write. In "crime and punishment" and "the idiot", he covers this and other questions more profoundly and even attempts to answer some of them, making them some of his best work (in my opinion)...

But I do agree with you. Here he leaves the question open, or almost...

[colegegrad]

I can't make out that last part, "Will the brothers learn to imitate the forgiveness of Christ, or will they imitate the hated and cruelty of the _____?"