Loretta Marron busts a Cancer Quack
Uploader Comments (rachiesyd)
All Comments (24)
-
@SHARKREEF2011 provide some evidence please. And more than just an anecdote thanks.
-
@SHARKREEF2011 You mean it wasn't the cancer that killed her?
-
@SHARKREEF2011 Got a reference on Pubmed or a link to the relevant journal so we can read the study?
-
Also Sharkreef, please try to use punctuation, put spaces between words and use capital letters where necessary. Thanks.
-
Sharkreef, I'm just gonna remove any offensive comments you post, so be polite, provide evidence for your claims or be banned. Simple.
-
@guns1inger is a liar.----- CDC MAJOR STUDY ON HUMAN TEST SUBJECTS-Controlled Clinical Evaluations of Chlorine Dioxide,Chlorite and Chlorate in Man
by Judith R. Lubbers,*Sudha Chauan,* and Joseph R.Bianchine*
'within the limits of the study, the relative SAFTY of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites,chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated by the ABSENCE of
detrimental physiological response.
quackquack,gos the oncology duck.;)
-
@sharkreef2011 - Jim Humble is a sadly deluded man who may well believe he is doing good, but actual, real science just doesn't stack up. Jim himself admits he has no scientific studies that back him up, although he claims it is because he can't afford to fund them. MMS is no miracle - it is bleach, plain and simple. Injecting it or drinking it, it does none of the things claimed as a cure.
sharkreef2011 has been blocked for spamming.
rachiesyd 2 weeks ago
The study sharkreef2011 refers to is a 1981 study that uses a small pool of subjects (60) and makes no claim to test the efficacy of the treatment, only to monitor for side effects. The full study can be found on pubmed as article PMC1569027 including a link to the complete paper in pdf format. It is worth noting two things - the study does not look at the efficacy of MMS for any treating any disease, and sharkreef2011 has quote-mined the conclusion.
gullibilitykills 2 weeks ago
@gullibilitykills thanks
rachiesyd 2 weeks ago