Pangea
Uploader Comments (f4949)
Top Comments
-
who is this proposal directed at? australia is a dynamic and beautiful place, proud to be a nuclear free zone. now it's being considered a nuclear dumping zone to the rest of the world.
fuck. off.
-
The only safe answer is too send it into space.
anything else is evil lies.
All Comments (90)
-
love the video really good
-
How bout we dump it at your house tossers
-
put it on space rocket and fire it into the direction of the Sun ??..
-
In 1999 Pangea (sponsored by BNFL) rules out the idea of putting nuclear waste in areas where there is any of the following: "high rainfall, permeable rocks, and mountains which would drive the water flow."
In 2011, Cumbria that area of "high rainfall, permeable rocks and mountains" is bribed and lied to by the UK government. What good is money if the land is too fiercely radioactive to sustain life?
-
They don't make sense send it into space or put it on mars don't put it on earth and aus has alot of mining
-
dump it in Mick Dundee's back yard
-
Is that real or just a .......WTF...I don't fuckin think so!!!!!!! Over my dead body!.............We dont have nuclear power plants in this country why the hell would we want every other idiots waste from them? And the gov wants to tax us for carbon!?!?!?!
-
Once again, mankind FAIL. Firstly.. how long do they think befor they run out of space when 80% of are power comes from this?.. as opposed to 17%. Then... did they ever consider the terrorist implications this has?. All those fresh containers shipping around the world, thousands of opertunitys.
you all of you misspelled "pangea" it is spelled pangaea
qwertlivvy 2 years ago
Pangea is the correct spelling. Pangea Resources Australia Pty Ltd was registered as a listed company, Australian Company Number: 081 203 652 on the 12/01/1998, and was based at 30 The Esplanade, Perth, WA.
f4949 2 years ago