Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Challenge, Of Course

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
27,310
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2008

Federer challenges set point. (Federer vs. Andreev USO 2008)

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Players evolve over time. Of course Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian (and so on) are better than the players in the 90's. Federer, with the skills he has today, probably would have won every single Slam back then, because players get better. Just like Novak Djokovic plays better right now than any other player has in the history of tennis. It's just normal. Just look at mens' 100m sprint. The world records get faster by each generation because they can learn things from earlier generations.

  • You can have your opinion and I respect that. You can think Sampras is the greatest of all time and Federer isn't - fine. But claiming that Federer would've won 2 or 3 Slams had he played in the 90's is just complete BULLSHIT. Still you could've said "he would've won 0 Slams" so at least props for that

  • @89Pleasek fuck OFF IDIOTS

  • Cool story, bro.

    And btw, your comment is a complete joke.

  • @slatz20 I bet you know nothing about tennis. It has been a great debate about who's the greatest of all time. U said Federer could not win in the 90s because Agassi,Edberg,Chang,.... were greater than players in Federer's time?? U r totally wrong. Dont tell me Roddick,Hewitt,Safin,Djokovic,­Nadal,Nalbadian,Murray all play for money.Most of them have won a grand slam title, and because of that, they will not play only for money.I bet my life that none of them are worse than Edberg,Chang,Becker,.

  • @michaelowen8 Thats why he won so often u moron. because he doesnt play for the money...the other bitches does. Like Roddick or Dawidenko. U really think Federer had a Chance in the 90s??? What a fucking joke. He would have won perhaps 2 or 3 Grand Slams. Thats all. And Sampras is the greatest of all Time. He had the toughest field to beat. - Agassi, Edberg, Chang, Goran Ivanisevic, Boris Becker, Patrick Rafter...they all played for the Title.

  • @slatz20 ok i dont wanna be rude, but you son of a bitch stretch your ears and listen.

    every players join the tournament for money. But there is more than that. They play with their heart, performing all the beauty on the court when millions of people watching only two of them.

    Ask yourself, during his career, earning more than $60 million, why would Federer cried after a loss, especially at a Grand Slam final?

    It is the pride, the honour to hold the trophy, to be the Best Player of All Time.

  • @wingra10 totally

  • @slatz20 are you really serious?????

  • Somebody's majorly pissed. XD

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more