WTC molten metal "evidence"

Professor Steven Jones reveals the source of his "molten metal" evidence that he claims is proof that thermite was used to bring down the WTC. The entire video can be found at question911.com

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Steven
• Jones
• thermite
• evidence
• molten
• metal
• WTC
• terror
• arson

[BladeMcCool]

The cutting torch does not leave the same chemical traces as thermite/thermate.

[blogologist]

The odds that molten metal fragments from a thermite cut then going through the violent collapse would end up inside dirt stuck to the column are astronomical. However, the odds that molten metal from a cutting torch would be there are pretty darn good. Also, the higher the floor, the thinner the metal, yet Jones makes no effort to verify which floor the metal came from. I posted this video with the assumption that the viewer was able to use basic, common sense. Please do so.

[Elkahatchee9]

Exactly right, Wez666...Jones found NOT A TRACE of barium nitrate (a key thermite/ate marker) in the WTC rubble...also, the amount of sulfur found does not match the amount of thermite/ate which would be required to cause collapse...

On youtube see

9/11 DEBUNKED: THERMITE CHEMICAL SIGNATURES DISPROVEN

[macchef01]

@blogologist magnesium and sulfate are not a biproduct of cutting steel. they are on the otherhand Key ingredients in thermal charges.

[apbriggs07]

@Daddyo930 Thanks, that's between 483 and 586mph.

[Daddyo930]

@apbriggs07 The aircraft, according to data from NTSB, FEMA and NORAD put the speeds at 420 and 510 knots. Boeing has a VMO/MMO flight limitations review. In it, nowhere on the graph do you see any speed above 350 KIAS.

[apbriggs07]

@Daddyo930 What speed were the aircraft supposedly travelling when they hit, also does anyone know the maximum speed a 767 can fly at, at sea level? Those basics facts should be easy to find but are strangely absent from many discussions. Some estimates were 560mph which would exceed the mach rating of the aircraft.

[Daddyo930]

What do you stupid fucks have to say now who were saying that there was no molten metal or thermitic material found at ground zero? Peer reviewed scientific evidence has been presented and you still don't acknowledge it. Besides that, professional analysis of the aircraft that allegedly hit their targets that day pose their own problems as to speed. Structural failure should have taken those planes down at that speed.

[gukonni]

The moten metal was probably aluminum since it melts at the temperatures that were present after the towers fell and there was an abundant amount in the buildings. There's no evidence for temperatures high enough to melt steel. As for Steve Jones, to understand his 'evidence' you first have to look at the man. He's made many spurious claims based on flimsy evidence. I'll assume he's talking about daffy duck for all I care until somebody who has credibility can analyze it.

[gukonni]

How did this guy get on C-SPAN? What a joke. I guess they gotta give people their say, but I worry what kind of people are watching it. Do they actually believe this?

[taledarkside]

@mikebuhroo

jones evidence is a joke. Many physics, chemists and structural engineers agree that he is an idiot.

[WTCnucleardemolition]

The FBI polygraphers will clean-up this mess.

Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"