Zakir Naik vs. Evolution (Debunking)

Utter lies and propaganda by famous Islamic scholar Zakir Naik.


Video by Donexodus2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty1Bo6GmPqM

Ken Miller's lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi8FfMBYCkk

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Zakir
• Naik
• Evolution
• Islam
• Koran
• Quran
• Ken
• Miller
• Darwin
• Debunking
• The
• Theory
• Religion
• Intelligent
• Design

[ayatullah100b]

If you don't know what science is than rather stop, when theory is proven to be fact, it becomes law, thats why we call it law of gravity, atomic theory is noting, its called bohr's theory and stuff, but now its called atomic law as well because it has been proven thoroughly. The theory of evolution was just assumption without any proof. Well if you have proove than stick to it.

[Zoaguyver]

@ayatullah100b I call bullshit on that. In fact you don't understand scientific terminology.

A law is a general observation about the universe. A theory is our explanation of said law. What you just described in your comment is not a theory, that is a hypothesis.

Evolution has a lot of proof. I doubt you'll do any research but I'll tell you some anyway.

1) Observed instances in labs such as nylonaise bacteria

2) Complete correspondence with fossil record

3) DNA retroviruses

[ayatullah100b]

@Zoaguyver You know whatever fossels there are as a prove, they are all fabricated, no real evidence is sufficient to hold the theory of evolution correct. I have studied psychology and i know how the people claim the theory to be true? Even genetic engineering has been proved to be wrong, human mind can't comprehend what genetics is by looking at DNA or just genes. They all trow a stone at blind target. One says something and other refutes it.

[Zoaguyver]

@ayatullah100b You're saying alot of things but providing no proof for them. You're claims are ridiculous and unfounded. Also if you've studied psychology you should know why people like you don't accept evolution. BTW studying psychology doesn't make you an expert on Biology and geneology. Also you never answered any of my proofs. you just said they were false not caring to explain how.

Explain how the markings of DNA retroviruses exist? They are a chronological marker. Explain

[Zoaguyver]

@notionSlave Quoting scripture is the last refuge of a man with no reasonable argument. I'll read this book you recommend but only because it sounds like good material for another video.

but i have to ask: do you realize how ignorant you are of scientific principles? You paraphrased a religious propaganda website saying that it was what atheists believe. You're full of shit. If you actually cared about knowledge you'd ask an atheist what they believe. You don't care what others believe.

[Zoaguyver]

@fitnessforyou1 WOW that's a new level of denial. There are NO fossils?

[lokenath123]

Good job. Videos such as this will go a long way to establishing truth over bullshit such as creation. Congratulations. It's a pity people cling on to tradition when every evidence points otherwise. But they don't stop at that, they try to teach that bullshit in schools! That's criminal, clouding young minds with plain lies.

[YusufSMahmood]

@Zoaguyver You were VERY wrong about that part at 5:24. According to the theory of evolution, we humans evolved from hominids who WERE APES, smd we are homonoids who ARE APES! Both you and Zakir Naik were wrong. We DID descend from apes. Any respected Biology textbook should include that fact.

"...homonoids, consists of primates informally called apes. This group includes... homo (humans)." -Cambell Biology, 7th edition. Page 700 So humans are homonoids and apes.

[TheMrgoku1985]

@ReligionOfTruthOne

watch?v=S9am3mfaE6U

Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens