Dr. Quantum Teaches Basis for Law of Attraction

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• DrQuantum

[bazle64]

Law of attraction? This video is explaining wave/particle uncertainty principle of matter. Change the title

[celestian1111]

I love Dr Q. Makes it fun to watch. Best explanation I've ever matched actually.

[48acar19]

This is awesome. I learned it many decades ago, but this is the funniest way to explain it. Kids would love physics!

[CupCakeArmy1]

@Theroadsarehazy

No.

No observation is necessary, just an interaction between two things. God may provide you with (false) answers and conclusions, but unless you can describe HOW (he) does such a thing the answer is useless and thus ultimately irrelevant.

[CupCakeArmy1]

@steverock85

I highly recommend viewing the following video on QED. The observer plays NO part in this save for causing an interaction in a location where the particle could exist. When were bring all this up to the macro level, we tend to see only the sum of the whole, and not the individual parts. Thus we only see matter were it has the HIGHEST probability chance of existing in any particular point in space.

QED: youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=v1GdgD77­AQ4

[CupCakeArmy1]

@digitised

I think its best to think of wave/particle duality as the PROBABILITY of where the particle is at, at any given moment. Particles usually have a higher probability of being in one place, than the other. However, an interaction with matter at any point where the probability of it existing there is not zero, will result in a percentage chance of it ACTUALLY being there when when some force causes an interaction to the particle and collapses the wave function at that point.

[CupCakeArmy1]

@digitised Q-Computers run of q-bits(typically photons), and not transistors. They also operate entirely within the realm of our universe and normal physics. The biggest problem with q-computers is how to keep them in an entangled state while still being able to measure the q-bits. (Remember, entanglement is post detection superposition, however measurements can still very easily collapse the wave function.)

[CupCakeArmy1]

@steverock85

I think another important part of this experiment that many may not realize, is that when the photon hits the detector in the back, it only hits it in one spot and the wave function collapses there instead of at the slits. In order for this experiments to work, light must be able to travel from source to detector without another interaction in between. In this case, the photons that hit the sides of the d-slit and do not go through collapse the wave function right there.

[CupCakeArmy1]

@steverock85

Human observers are not required. Infact, no observers are required at all. The only thing it takes is an interaction. (Observation is a form of an interaction, for light exists in many different places at once, so we can collapse the wave function by looking where light SHOULD be) You must also remember that we can only "see" light after it has bounced off an object causing an interaction. An obs device here collapses the wave function because we are looking at each photon singly

[steverock85]

@digitised

But I have not yet establish if they tested it. I still don't know if they observed with out recording the data and keep the ambiguity to the real observer.

[steverock85]

@digitised

If a human is not needed and the data is not stored in any way for future references, then it is not about observer. It is likely something else which we have still not figured out.