Religion vs Science - Natural Design

The debate between religion and science has been leaving a void of confusion to the understanding of the beginnings of this planet we call Earth.
This video put side-by-side the most modern scientific facts and theories on how the Earth came to be, along with the Biblical scripture version.
How similar the two are to each other will surprise you. The scientific community believes in a "Natural Selection" to explain the wonders of this world, religious community in an "Intelligent Design" as an explanation our planet. For the sake of all in between, I am calling this "Natural Design"
if science is the study of the natural world and God created the natural world,then wouldn't scientists be studying God's works?
I know this video will not solve this problem, but I hope it will shed some light on the subject.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ♦science
• religion
• evolution
• creation
• planets
• solar
• system
• God
• heavens
• earth
• physical
• Sun
• Moon

[deichshaf]

Hell yeah, the earths magnetic field has taken occupation of the moon and since then it is surrounding earth. From all theories i've heard so far this is the most ludicrous one. I'm sort of amused of such a big amount of physical misunderstanding.

At last any theory can be modified to fit the point of view. But at least people should try not to fool others by ignoring prooven facts.

[WhiteTreeProd]

@deichshaf Combination of Energies found in the cores of the Earth and the Moon is the power source for the revolutions and even effects the earths tide. Unless you think it is all just pure Magic? (ludicrous)

This video was Not to made to fit a specific point of view. In fact the acquisition of the moon was the 1 of 2 parts of the Bible that did NOT match the order that science reviles. The other is the time line of 7 days

Often Scientists Facts/Theory are are often disputed by each other

[azmanabdula]

insanity breeds?

if every concept is true..........who's wrong?

and for that matter whats wrong?

since your "god" made it!

[WhiteTreeProd]

@azmanabdula I originally made this video to show how far off the bible was on the facts of science. To my surprise I found it very parallel in the order in which each stage occurred. The 7 days this is obviously way off and the acquisition of the moon but otherwise the same order. The thing that really surprised me was the Expansion of the earth is a fairly new concept in science but is there in the bible. Who really knows if there is a god or not, we won't truly know until we kick the bucket.

[peepo9000]

how are we here wtf what kind of shit is this im just a dude

[MrHoolits]

Wow, what a bunch of nonsense. You should be ashamed!

[maestroaxeman]

being a person who first began as a believer in the hypothesis in science, I began wondering about the big bang, and who lit the fuse. I find them linked in so many ways (creation-wise) that one could not exist without the other; whether I follow causality and all hypothesis of science, or Who made it. I enjoy the hypothesis of science in all its wonder, but I am amazed that one Person could put it all together. I believe in both: the possibilities are endless. Man's curiosity and God's universe

[1tabligh]

@deichshaf We can raise precisely the same objection against the atheists and ask them, "If we follow the chain of causality back, we will ultimately reach the primary cause. Let us say that cause is not God, but matter. Tell us who created primary matter. You who believe in the law of causality, answer us Ws: if matter is the ultimate cause of all things, what is the cause of matter?

You say that the source of all phenomena is matter-energy; what is the cause and origin of matter-energy?"

[deichshaf]

@1tabligh That's what i meant with interpretation. I can use the bible as well for proof of the fact, that god wants war instead of love and peace. But does this 'fact' become true if i do so? Does it?

Believe what ever you want to believe. But do NOT try to convert me.

[deichshaf]

@1tabligh Have you EVER read science publications on the big-bang-theory? If yo, why do you ask this question? Clearly according to this theory there must have been something before the big bang.

I only was stating, that what the video shows about aquisition of the moon was ridiculous. I'm not going to discuss the whole big bang theory versus natural design because my knowledge on these is not very vast.

[1tabligh]

In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"

The Quran 21:30

[1tabligh]

How is it possible for a non-existing thing to create another thing (*big bang*) ? You consider my belief in an existing thing (God) that creates another non-existing thing (*big bang*) as absurd. But you do not consider your own, as to the non-existing thing having the power to create an already existing thing,(*big bang*) as absurd and stupid.

Be yourself the judge, and tell me whose theory is absurd and irrational.?

[1tabligh]

The purpose of your assertion would be that the *big bang* made itself twice. It would mean that its first endeavours consisted in creating itself, and when it was quite ready and created, it created itself again. This is the most *absurd* and impossible theory-the acquisition of what is already acquired.

If you say that it created itself before it came into existence, it is really *stupid*. Because it was absolutely nothing before it came into existence.

[1tabligh]

@deichshaf at least support the theory that there has been a "big bang".

____

If you will still persist in your ignorance at least assure me as to when this *big bang* created itself-whether it did it before it came into existence, or afterwards?

If you say afterwards, your assertion is absurd. Because it is impossible for a thing to create its own self when it was already created.