Subaru produced video compares real cost of ownership and environmental impact of hybrids vs. low emissions conventional gasoline powered cars. Accord hybrid now discontinued, of course, but value of points made here still relevant.
@calvinblinkee saving the world? the government only cares about money, or we'd all be driving cars that run on water, not expensive crap like this. And this running a vehicle on WATER has been PROVEN since 2002, why didn't the government go for that idea... Because water is free and it would put the fossil fuel industry out of business. they traded off a unit that can be mounted to any combustion engine for under $1000, for one that STILL uses fossil fuels and cost us 2x more in the end run.
Hybrids are crap compared to putting a Hydrogen or HHO unit into your existing car, and using WATER for fuel. Cost? under $1000 (varies with vehicle size) savings? well, I don't need gasoline anymore, polution? nothing, only water drips outta the muffler, wear and tear on engine? less because burning hho dousn't create ANY carbon. and last but not least, NO extra battery's required. Hybrids were doomed before they were even designed.
@alyr315 Yea it has went through rougher times and they naturally get back to normal. But now that we're here and are preventing it from getting back to normal. Lets see one example: Firefighters are putting out natural forest fires when they should be letting them burn. But of course they got houses there so noo.....
where do they live that gas is that cheap...
zeroxanthony 1 week ago
32 yrs lolllll
mynameisjavin 6 months ago
Hmmm... Sounds pretty biased towards the conventional gas car.
bassist4dalord 10 months ago
accord does 30+ mpg in a city
TheAndrey 10 months ago
What ever happened to the vw diesel rabbit from 1980 that got 50+ MPG, these new hybred cars are for shit.
musclecarpower 1 year ago
@calvinblinkee saving the world? the government only cares about money, or we'd all be driving cars that run on water, not expensive crap like this. And this running a vehicle on WATER has been PROVEN since 2002, why didn't the government go for that idea... Because water is free and it would put the fossil fuel industry out of business. they traded off a unit that can be mounted to any combustion engine for under $1000, for one that STILL uses fossil fuels and cost us 2x more in the end run.
Me102288 1 year ago
Hybrids are crap compared to putting a Hydrogen or HHO unit into your existing car, and using WATER for fuel. Cost? under $1000 (varies with vehicle size) savings? well, I don't need gasoline anymore, polution? nothing, only water drips outta the muffler, wear and tear on engine? less because burning hho dousn't create ANY carbon. and last but not least, NO extra battery's required. Hybrids were doomed before they were even designed.
Me102288 1 year ago
@alyr315 uhm thats not what he meant with the words he used actually....
eckstudios 1 year ago
@alyr315 Yea it has went through rougher times and they naturally get back to normal. But now that we're here and are preventing it from getting back to normal. Lets see one example: Firefighters are putting out natural forest fires when they should be letting them burn. But of course they got houses there so noo.....
calvinblinkee 1 year ago
@alyr315 hey hey hey that was over a year ago which means I have already learned hybrids are useless LOL
calvinblinkee 1 year ago