MicroEvolution vs MacroEvolution (cdk007 Mirror)

This video is a mirror of the original video by cdk007. If you are not subscribed to his channel already, please subscribe now. He makes some of the best educational videos on youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/user/cdk007

Has MacroEvolution really never been observed? Have scientists really never seen one "kind" evolve into another "kind"? Surely information can't ever been added to the genome by unintelligent processes.

Or can it?

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creation
• Religion
• God
• Speciation
• Information
• Genome
• DNA
• Kind
• Answers
• Genesis
• Macro
• Micro
• Fact
• Education
• Dog
• Cat
• cdk007

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 digest a material that never existed before the modern era. In fact, when an organism is considered together with the environment it evolved in, there is no need to account for the creation of information. The information in the genome forms a record of how it was possible to survive in a particular environment. It is not created, but rather gathered from the environment through research, by trial and error, as mutating organisms either reproduce or fail.

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 I think I understand now what you mean by new information. it's important that we not be vague with or descriptions. you should say new genetic information compared to the original. New information is regularly generated in evolution like when a mutation or a gene duplication arises. Dramatic examples of entirely new, unique traits arising through mutation have been observed in recent years, such as the evolution of nylon-eating bacteria, which developed new enzymes to efficiently

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 I have, many times. It's logged in my bio lab journals. I gave you the example of "Chlorella vulgaris to Coelosphaerium". it's recorded and documented.

i am a skeptic and a free thinker, and all hypothesis and theories deserve to be criticized. evolution has been for over a 150 years and has stood the test of time. charles darwin would shit his pants if he knew of DNA and genetic drift and mutations and other fossil discoveries the only help reconfirm the theory.

[theot58]

@TooTuffShuff Now you are being down right silly.

All I am asking you to do is to appy the scientific method and skeptically examine the Darwinian/Macro evolution dogma you have believed.

What is the evidence supporting Darwinian/Macro evolution?

And please don't tell me there is "mountains of evidence" - tell me WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 I can give you a million quotes from more credible sources. Quotes are useless in debate for the most part. that's called "an appeal to authority".

Adam Shuff, creationist propaganda control, 5th year Sr student, Ohio University, 2 quarters from a bachelors degree with over 200 credit hours said:

"people that aren't reasonable can't be reasoned with" and "people that dont acknowledge when you debunk their uneducated claim aren't worth debating because they are bigots and close minded"

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 But obviously, no person that knows anything about evolution would say that the replication of one single strand of DNA creates a new species. It usually takes many many many significant changes to the genome for speciation to occur.

also, when DNA replicates, errors can occur such as the wrong base pair being added, which would be an example of a mutation. that new information is no longer the same as the original information and will not work the same function as the old info.

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 I dont think our discussion can go any further if you dont start acknowledging my points. i have proven you wrong in every response and you fail to mention anything about changing your opinions or anything of the sort, like any humble person would do in a debate.

Replicating a DNA takes little molecules that were once not information, combines them and makes it into "information". 

[TooTuffShuff]

@theot58 I dont think our discussion can go any further if you dont start acknowledging my points. i have proven you wrong in every response and you fail to mention anything about changing your opinions or anything of the sort, like any humble person would do in a debate.

Replicating a DNA takes little molecules that were once not information, combines them and makes it into "information". But obviously, no person that knows anything about evolution would say that the replication of one single

[Akira625]

@theot58 Funny how this "Newton Tahmisian" person is only mentioned in creationist websites.

[theot58]

@TooTuffShuff If you think that copying one DNA molecule creates NEW information and NEW life forms; then I don't think our discussion can go any further.

I leave you with one final quote:

Dr. Newton Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission said:

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever!

In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact."