Chevrolet Cavalier Turbo vs JDM Honda Prelude 2.2 VTEC
Top Comments
All Comments (13)
-
Fyi a jdm H22A was not turbo. And I own a h23a1 prelude and in a straight line there not all that fun. If you want to take that cavalier to a auto x track it will get owned. Prelude's were known for there handling.
-
Btw, read the video title. If its a true jdm 2.2 then the honda has a turbo. Learn to read morons.
-
@Kyler2013 that's not the point. if the prelude was turbo'd it would rip the doors off that piece of shit
-
Who cares if the Honda lost it by "just a little"? Quit trying to back it with stupid ass statements you fucking Honda fanboys. A LOSS is a LOSS.
-
1) Not all "Honda" drivers think that way.
2) That particular model year made more stock torque and horsepower than the 03 cavalier.
3) I've driven both cars. I prefer the Prelude for its better handling and reliability. The cavalier feels outdated and doesn't look that appealing. IMO
-
@komputeruser 1987 was the last year of that body style, for 88, they got all rounded. It looks like a 2L single cam turbo engine probably swapped from a sunbird. Way cool machine.
-
@cyro70 he still lost ,,,,thats what its about,,,,honda drivers think its all about hp and 4get all about the ftlbs ,,,,,honda has lacked on torque from the start,,,,trade some hp for ftlbs and hondas could be a good car ,,,,,,,,honda FaIL !!!!
-
Old school cavi. 88ish?
-
funny
@badassmofo52 Why? hahaha. N/A vs Turbo and he only lost by a little bit. Have you ever driven a Honda? They have amazing handling, are bulletproof reliable, never felt outdated, and can be built like no other. You musty just assume all Honda drivers are ricers. Ha! Race my lude and you'll regret it.
TheVidRater007 10 months ago 5
thats gotta be embarrassing for the Honda. fucker.
badassmofo52 2 years ago 4