http://researchris.blogspot.com
http://freedomwatchnews.blogspot.com
http://infowars.com
Watch Richard Gage's 2 hour presentation "9/11: Blueprint for Truth". Using the scientific method to show that the 3 WTC towers could NOT have collapsed straight down at near free fall speed because of fires or structural damage. IF YOU ARE A SKEPTIC, THEN THIS VIDEO IS A MUST WATCH.
Click the link below to watch for free:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/911-blueprint-for-truth-scientific.html
DOWNLOAD a GREAT business card template for free, promoting http://AE911Truth.org and their mission:
" To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 collapses of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer. "
TAKE A L@@k AT THIS BUSINESS CARD TEMPLATE HERE:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/architects-engineers-for-911-truth.html
DOWNLOAD the file here for FREE:http://www.sendspace.com/file/q4h76n
Biden knows what he's doing. He's smart and clear. He would be a good president. I like Obama too, but on another video, Obama evades a question about 9-11 truth and Biden actually answers. Go Biden
Jadyellow8 4 years ago
Richardson had solid answers the whole debate, but even more importantly was able to show a basis for his ideas to ACTUALLY happen with his budget plans.
Plus, he wants to put money into education that we so desperately need. Our public education is losing by a landslide to other countries!
zjolbrun 4 years ago
Hillary weak answers but was able to pull it off. Obama - wherever the waves goes, but strong in some issues.Edwards Good strategy when it was important
Richardson- In my opinion the best answers and all suported by his policy plan. Gravel - one crazy one in the bunch, very loud , very funny
Kucinich- very serious about his answers unfortunately the debate too biased on the center seated stars Joe Byden- This is like a little Bush Dodd- another serious and smart gentlemen
lcamejo 4 years ago
May socialism enslave us all,for the greater good,to save myself from everyone and everything! In the name of "equality!"
Hillary Clinton 2008! OR
John Edwards 2008!
CbD1503 4 years ago
Kucinich. whoohoo
productetc 4 years ago
ahh I was only listening to it while I worked. assumed it was dodd.
grazie555 4 years ago
no one with a fake name, eg wolf blitzer should be running a presidential debate. it's too hollywood. also the candidates should be given long enough to answer, not be subserviant to some crazy little zionist and his corporate hegemony's advertisers time slots. this is an important issue
realestMC 4 years ago
It definitely came up in both the journalists questions and during the town hall forum parts of the debate. I don't remember which part of the 11 they were in, but it was definitely there. That was why richardson kept talking about being a "border governer"
funkydr79 4 years ago
How the heck did immigration not come up? Or did I miss it?
proofset666 4 years ago
Hillary drops some Milton Friedman, "there is no free lunch." Earlier she dropped some Barry Goldwater. I like those two, but I do not like her.
sswanick 4 years ago