Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The War For Exclusion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
975 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 25, 2011

Read By Ayanna Watson
Script By Raina Rhoades rhoadestoreality.wordpress.com
Editing By Jermaine Inoue
Logo By Ben Katz

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (BlackAtheistsAmerica)

  • Good video

  • @2011juantube Thank you. :-)

  • Great job, greetings from Italy

  • @xvegansxex Greetings.  :-)

  • I appreciate every video you post. It is always nice to have a constant reminder that my brother and I are not alone as a black free thinker.

  • @E1985Man Thank you!!

Top Comments

  • A Christian definition of an attack on them:

    "I'm a Christian."

    "I'm not."

    "Why are you persecuting me????"

  • @brilliancerising The shirt reads: "Slavery is Ok, Homosexuality not so much," with quoted bible verses.

    So to answer your question: the word of god thinks it's ok.

    What arguments are illegitimate?

see all

All Comments (97)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I am intrigued by the logic, or, rather, logistics of human law,

    and am amazed by the detail and subtlety of arguments that lawyers have to use.

    However, I could never be a lawyer, because my interest is NOT in upholding current law, but in creating an entirely new set or system of laws. I guess one would call that politics.

  • @nahaymath are "evil" merely for being groups, and religionists call them "conspiracies" as a derogatory term, even though that term is neutral to me.

    But, religionists are not mentally capable of comprehending their logical inconsistency by failing to label their churches as conspiracies.

  • Religionists have zero comprehension of the magnitude of influence.

    Set, group, collection, organization, political party, government - these names make no difference to me. What matters is the magnitude of their power and whether that power is for net good or net bad. Religionists will call organized groups of people bad or good as it suits their ideological agenda, not based on observed and self-consistent fact.

    Hence, to them, the IPCC and environmental groups and the OWS groups

  • @BlackAtheistsAmerica  Great comment!

  • I am so happy I found your channel. I look forward to your news letter.

  • @BlackAtheistsAmerica This is what I mean: I don't care if other people are religious, and I won't try to prove to them the non-existence of god; there're so many of them in the world; it'd be a losing battle anyway. Most atheists that I've seen/viewed on YOUTUBE are kind of preachy, like, they're trying to convert (proselytize) those who're religious.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more