Kasparov vs Deep Blue 1996 Game 2
Top Comments
All Comments (134)
-
I think Ra1 by the computer was a big mistake. Maybe something like Bd2 would've been a lot better!
-
I haven't gone over it, but I think Nd3 for Kasparov is viable too, instead of forking the rook and queen, although it'd be quite passive. Selective aggression, nevertheless, seems to be more effective in the long run.
-
@harKazoid86 humans get tired & frustrated
-
thank you for your videos, you have helped me so much, keep em comming!!!!!!!
-
6:00 White can take with his knight on c6 anyway. After black takes with bishop, white retakes with the bishop at g2 and black has to take back with his pawn and black has triple pawns.
-
Pretty soon computers will be to fast and waaay to tactical to even hope to beat
But wait let me think... did the computers build themselves?
Did deep blue give itself its own electricity? But wait better yet who can smash the computer into tiny pieces if he gets frustrated
-
@yisoonshin12 Yeah there were at least 12 games in 1996 and another 12 in 1997 - if you search "Kasparov v Deep Blue" it actually comes up with all the games played in both years, from game 1 to the final game which was lost by Kasparov in just 19 moves!! He resigned, he misplayed the opening, a premature ...h6 allowing a devestating knight sac on f7, Kasparov was uncastled and fell victim to a devestating attack - I urge you to look it up!! :)
-
Again, I like the analysis it's easy to listen to, good job :)
-
@scrivs01 well spotted I missed that! :)
-
"Gettin' all up in the grill of Deep Blue"....he says it so nonchalantly...
having the king go down to e6 at 32:00 would have been a bigger mistake than you think... white bishop to c4 checkmate.
scrivs01 6 months ago 6
Make the deep blue games a playlist that way they're all nice and organized
MakeTheStand 3 months ago 3