Fu Zhensong longxing baguazhang combat applications
Uploader Comments (asiaticus1)
All Comments (19)
-
If you practice Bagua for years and are still weaker and slower than opponents, you should look at your training and practice more, stronger, and probably more correct. Serious Bagua practice (same way as serious Taijiquan) gives you a heck of body strength. The "only with the strength of the opponent" blabla was a marketing method to cater the hippie folks, a serious Bagua or Taijiquan practitioner is strong like a bull.
-
@czitek1 Well, they both comes from Taoism :) moving in cicles
But Aikido focused on disabling an opponent without hurting him/her.
Baguazhang, the original purpose is to kill. In this video there are only baguazhang "wrestling techniques".
Classical baguazhang also includes various type of punching, stabbing with fingers into vulnerable organs, like kidney or the gonad (sure kill), dim-mak, dislocate/break bones. It's a very violent art o.0
-
@TanSauNg2008 I disagree. Baguazhang is not aikido, really.
And STRENGTH and AGILITY is extremely important to a fight. Therefore, utilizing your strength and agility is the purpose of martial arts.
IMO, the basic principle of winning a fight is that you HAVE TO have the strength and/or agility not too different from your opponent. If you have that, and with the correct usage of techniques, you win.
Baguazhang: 1.Focusing on the speed/"cunningness"
2.Qigong-> improve your strength
Regards,
-
plese write me the fuzhensong in chinese?thanks
-
principal like aikido
-
sicuram non vi siete mai trovati ad affrontare una vera rissa. questa arte serve a dare una vana speranza ai deboli ma nella vita reale si rischiano tanti schiaffoni. mai visto nessuno che attacca con un pugnetto ai 2 all'ora e aspetta la tua risposta. guardate le risse su youtube e provate ad immaginare come applicare le mossettine, sareste calpestati..
The techniques, used as they are presented here, work only if you are stronger and faster than the opponent.
But it is not always the case. So the usage of techniques here is not correct Bagua.
TanSauNg2008 2 years ago 2
This is right for a few techniques but not for all techniques.
asiaticus1 2 years ago
Ad ogni modo mi sono trovato diverse volte in vere risse.
ciao
Loriano
asiaticus1 2 years ago
Penso che tu abbia ragione. Però non scambiare qualche albero per la foresta, Queste non vogliono essere più che semplici tecniche per mostrare un loro uso, niente più. Effettivamente il combattimento ha una dimensione diversa. il che non significa che una singola tecnica non possa trovarvi il suo posto. Una cosa che rimprovero a molti maestri cinesi è infatti quello di offrire singole tecniche senza un contesto in cui applicarle.
cordiali saluti
Loriano
asiaticus1 2 years ago
Thanks again
Loriano
asiaticus1 2 years ago
only thing that ponders me is the torso bending back when taking the attack; such evasion I've understood to be abomination for the internal arts.
Scalier 3 years ago
Really it is common, in internal as in external.
asiaticus1 3 years ago