How to talk to an OSTRICH: "IT'S US"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Etheoperatorsmanual's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Etheoperatorsmanual's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Etheoperatorsmanual's video to your playlist.
Published on Apr 25, 2012
Richard Alley address a common argument about climate change: that increasing amounts of carbon dioxide, CO2, are coming from natural sources, like volcanoes. He explains how analysis of the carbon atoms in the CO2 shows that they are the type that comes from burning fossil fuels. Therefore, the only possible explanation can be... "It's Us."
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
20:18
How to talk to a climate change denierby visionOntvFeatured
11,069
-
26:47
Climate Change, Man vs. Nature on HOUSTON 8by HoustonPBS
1,741 views
-
1:07
Richard Alley: How do we know the CO2 rise is Man Made?by greenman3611
4,193 views
-
4:19
How to Talk to an Ostrich: "We can't Afford Clean Energy"by Etheoperatorsmanual
3,809 views
-
3:26
How to Talk to an OSTRICH: Today's CO2 is nothing Specialby Etheoperatorsmanual
6,104 views
-
4:52
How to talk to an OSTRICH: Abrupt Climate Changeby EARTH: The Operators' Manual
3,034 views
-
3:05
"How to Talk to an Ostrich - We're not Addicted to Burning!"by EARTH: The Operators' Manual
3,618 views
-
2:26
october2011NBC720.movby greenmanbucket's channel
7,774 views
-
2:22
"We don't know enough..." How to talk to an OSTRICHby EARTH: The Operators' Manual
2,109 views
-
3:40
How to talk to an OSTRICH: The Pentagon & Climate Changeby Etheoperatorsmanual
1,849 views
-
6:33
Is What You Ate For Breakfast Killing The Planet? Marjory Wildcraft Interviews Ronnie Cummingsby Marjory Wildcraft
919 views
-
20:03
23 -- Medieval Warm Period -- fact vs. fictionby potholer54
80,010 views
-
5:29
Hansen Corrects BBC on Climate Warmingby greenmanbucket's channel
3,006 views
-
2:37
How to talk to an OSTRICH: "Global Warming Stopped in 1998!"by Etheoperatorsmanual
4,693 views
-
15:29
Monckton Bunkum Part 3 - Correlations and Himalayan glaciersby potholer54
42,428 views
-
10:31
Global Warming: What We Knew in 82by Climate Denial Crock of the Week
47,195 views
-
1:04:03
Creationism vs. Evolution...and Global Warming: An updateby NatCen4ScienceEd
9,685 views
-
1:52
The New "Portland Plan" - Neighborhoods and Cyclingby Etheoperatorsmanual
793 views
-
3:23
How to Talk to an Ostrichby Climate Denial Crock of the Week
7,345 views
-
1:48
How to Talk to an Ostrich: "Who says CO2 heats things up?"by EARTH: The Operators' Manual
1,061 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
PT109Boat 1 year ago
Like if you were brought here by the Greenman
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
JMajorLITD 1 year ago
Excellent explanation.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (25)
64jcl 2 weeks ago
Its not a non-issue when average temperatures globally increase by +5C over normal in the end of this century if we keep on with business as usual. The temperature difference between the last ice age and the one we have is only -6C globally. 0.8C warming is obviously already enough to melt the Arctic so in my eyes its not slight at all. The extra heat now being trapped due to lower albedo will no doubt increase the rate of warming even more. And I haven't even mentioned methane here...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
1000frolly 1 month ago
Boy, you are far gone. You have been conned big time.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
1000frolly 1 month ago
After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of multidimensional datasets,inserting decentred proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projections,which we then averaged.We utilized a liberally unprincipled component analysis to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a hockey stick,which gave an unequivocal prediction,(95%+probability) that we are totally screwing all of you
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Dodger481 1 month ago
We also know that the warming is so slight that it is a non issue. 2000 years from now we may have to reduce fossil fuel consumption today we are fine.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
64jcl 1 month ago
Are we living on the same planet? There is a clear and significant warming that has happened since pre industrial times. You can cherry pick dates on a strong El Niño and La Niña to create your bogus statistics, but the trend in temperatures is clear and steadily rising. 90% of the warming is actually happening in the ocean which also suffer acidification due to increased CO2 as well as rising sea levels. Its basic physics and very well known science now.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Dodger481 1 month ago
Lol it is us, unfortunately there is no large corresponding warming. During the past 16 years we have had no statistically significant warming. clearly this is a non issue.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Richard Lock 2 months ago
There's a common myth that ostriches put their heads in the sand when they see something that they don't want to see i.e. a predator, in the hope that if the don't see it, it will go away. Man-made climate change "deniers" put their "head in the sand" when they are shown evidence for what they don't want to see i.e. man-made climate change.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ubu987 6 months ago
It's just name calling. The "ostriches" also called "deniers" are the people who find this kind of propaganda unconvincing.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Lexoka 6 months ago
OK, but what does that have to do with ostriches?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Grass89Eater 7 months ago
Us seams to only make war in desert areas so getting solar power seams logical.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube