"This is John Galt speaking" #8 (Second Draft)
Uploader Comments (XCowboy2)
All Comments (57)
-
Ayn Rand PROMOTES selfishness and egotism. I believe that is wrong. That promotes division, hate, violence, social unrest.
I believe altruism and "loving your neighbor as yourself" to be PROMOTED; not by force or coercion, but by words and persuasion. Its in the Bible!!! Rand is intelligent but not that much.
People are more charitable when they are not coerced by high taxes.
We are all in this together!!! Together we stand, divided...
-
Clearly you do not understand Rand.
She had no problem with altruism. Voluntarily taking care of those who are incapable of taking care of themselves is well within the Randian lexicon.
Altruism at the point of a gun is what Rand argued, highly intelligently, against.
If you support government taking taxes and then spending those taxes on those who have not earned them, you are an enemy of your fellow man for you are advocating the use of Force to achieve your, and other's, goals.
-
Who is William Hickman?
-
John Galt is not real.
-
Ayn Rand's vision is so different from Ludvig von Misses.
Rand believes in self love, selfishness and egotism.
Misses, although a true believer of freedom, understands better human nature; he believes in human altruism... not due to coercion, but free will.
-
@Miggins88 Miggins Hitler delt with people thru force. John Galt neither proposes violence or force nor excepts force and eals with force only in retaliation of force and does not initiate it. He deals with man thru logic and reason. He excepts reality as his judge and both parties learn and prosper. Hitler dealt with people with the threat to their life if they do not obey his irrational want of worship. John Galt simply walks away if both parties can not agree. I am sorry you cannot see this.
-
It's amazing that there's really that much energy in just a few grams of Uranium.
-
Who is this John Galt guy? He sounds like an arrogant nazi cunt about to commit an act of genocide. Fuck him.
-
i hope they don't ruin the book with this movie they're puttin together next yr
-
I will not inflict the diseases of tax and spend on society; it harms others, it does not aid them. If I spend it to seek my profit, it hones their productivity and gives them more potential wealth-my interests is theirs, the more our subjective values are different. The division of labour makes society profit from heterogeneity.
Hello All! I Posted an alternate version of #8- Thanks for your input.
XCowboy2 2 years ago
i think galt's demand to choose "our work or your guns" really clashes with the Nazi demanding a mother to choose which of her children will die. I was like "why did he use that picture?" galt's ultimatum is meant for the Nazi, not the holocaust victim.
natdavi 2 years ago
hey Nat- I'm uploading a alternate version- so many comments are coming back negative I'm rethinking this episode. Maybe I did rush it a bit- trying to recover from the hard drive failure.
XCowboy2 2 years ago
I find this episode considerably weaker than "The Destroyers, Part I". Why did you exclude footage of Hitler and the exploding swastika?
Not to mention the missing music from Schindler's List.
JohnGaltAustria 2 years ago
Um, Hitler's still there, the exploding swastika is still there. The Schindler's list music was a bit too syrupy, but I still would have used it but the corrupted hard drive also corrupted that audio file so that the mp4 permissions wouldnt work any more. I tried all sorts of ways of capturing the music before deciding that something else might be called for. I'm disappointed after so much effort my first comment should be so negative. If others feel the same I'll consider yank it and star over.
XCowboy2 2 years ago
Its interesting you should depict a slim woman dressed in a white sweater with shoulder length brunette hair before speaking of retaliatory violence. Co-incidence or artful selection?
sjgibbs80 2 years ago
I'm not sure which image you're talking about.
XCowboy2 2 years ago