For John McAdams

I made this video in response to professor John McAdams who has claimed that there was no large protrusion in the back of President Kennedy's head which appeared after the explosion of the head had completely subsided.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• JFK
• assassination
• conspiracy
• zapruder
• oswald

[warrenrab]

Interesting but ultimately irrelevant. So much clutching at straws in all of this.

[bobharris77]

@warrenrab Why would you think it is "irrelevant" that Kennedy was the victim of multiple shooters and therefore, a conspiracy??

[TheCrossroads09]

First time I've seen that sudden change in the outline of the rear of Kennedy's head in the Nix film so clearly. There were no sudden movements at that point by the President that would cause blurr and relatively to the other passengers it looks like the only real change. Two guns changes history but also the credibility of the office of the President if LBJ had an (insight) into the attack where does it all lead to if the likes of Bob can put this all together.

[bobharris77]

@TheCrossroads09 The reason that "the likes of Bob" can figure out something like this is not because I am particularly smart. Lots of brighter people got it wrong because they didn't invest 16 years of study, and in almost every case, were heavily biased one way or the other. To the best of my ability, I research this stuff with zero concern about where the chips fall. And that pays off, more than you might ever think.

[stu1002]

@bobharris77 Great to see you back with a new video Bob :)

[jacktorse28]

What about the utterly massive wound to the right front of his head? Wouldn't that have to come from behind? What parkland doctor described that wound? So we have a film and an autopsy that doesn't agree with the doctors at parkland. I think Doug Horne is closer than anybody so far to getting this whole mess figured out.

[TrueNovice]

@bobharris77 Because they disliked JFK and were well pleased he was killed. But instead of saying that, they claim he stole the election from Nixon, he was sexually immoral, and anyway it made no difference since Johnson pursued the same policies as JFK especially in Vietnam. Left wingers claim JFK was a dangerous cold warrior who brought the world to the brink of nuclear war, while right wingers claim JFK was a Red appeaser who failed to confront Communism adequately.

[no288]

if there was a second shot to the head what happened to that bullet then?

[jacktorse28]

Mr. Harris. What do you think about Doug Horne's conclusions that the Z-film is hoaxed?

[tregoj1]

@bobharris77 Good response, Bob. "Clutching at" reminds me of Kennedy grabbing at his throat. I think finding out about when Gov. Connally was shot could shed more light on what happened. He seems to be hit very late, just as the head shot comes. Why wouldn't he pass out sooner? The wounds he received were near fatal yet he's in good shape until Nellie pulls him down. They cleaned and pressed his suit so nobody could say that Kennedy's brains were never on his clothes. Let's wrap this up!

[tregoj1]

Look at frame 317! The back of the head is painted out!



[Topcat1984x]

The assasination has fascinated me since i was a child, and i stood where JFK was shot, my opinion is JFK was shot from the Daltex building and from the Knoll, With Ruby supplying the phoney policeman with their uniforms. This is just my opinion though. Great videos Bob, keep up the good work.

[ManicMoviegoer]

I may not be an expert on this subject, and believe me, I appreciate the amount of time you have put into this. But I am a firm believer that the simplest explanation if most often the correct one, and what we can all plainly see here is the front of JFK's head being blown out. Not the back. Any protrusion that may or may not exist on the back of his head can simply be the result of what happens when a man is shot in the the head.