Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ron Paul - Oath of Office?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
404 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love the way Newt looks at him after he mentions that he's been married for 54 years.

  • If they come up "real short" they're not under VALID oaths, they're under PERJURED oaths, meaning they are NOT IN OFFICE, which requires a VALID OATH. They are occupying office de facto, but are not exercising it de jure. They need to be REMOVED as USURPERS and PERJURERS.

  • Absolutely wonderful response! Ron Paul 2012

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more