Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Panther Lady (1932)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,653
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 17, 2007

What about some rock'n'roll? Eleanor Thatcher singing and Joyzelle Joyner as the Panther Lady in this odd number from Wild People 1932.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Don't forget the Production Code was self imposed on Hollywood, who also used it for publicity in a very self serving way. Banning and censure ship add to box office takings!! De Mille used this principle many times in his big budget films, what you actually saw was basically "safe", but was publicised as censured material, watered done under pressure from the Hays Office.There is little in this clip that would have got it banned!

  • @payless1981 Did they use swear words back then?

  • which one is Elissa Linde?

  • @castletriglav Hi castletriglav, The Sign of the Cross (1932) DID have something to do with the implementation of the Production Code in 1934. The lesbian dance Joyzelle Joyner did with Elissa Landi in the movie was the last straw for the Production Code. It was started in the 1920s with the Fatty Arbuckle scandal but then it went lax as the Roaring Twenties went by. The Production Code went into full force in 1934 because of the last straw of Joyzelle's dance with Elissa Landi.

  • @astralagosto Actually, the entire Production Code nonsense, began with the Fatty Arbuckle/Virginia Rappe scandal. Along with a few other Hollywood scandals, there was pressure to 'clean up" the movie industry as a whole. No code was enforced until Joseph Breen took over in 1934. The Sign of the Cross had little or nothing to do with enforcement of the code.

  • This was right before Censorship was put into effect in Hollywood. I believe they changed all the rules a year later in '33 or 34. Just look at any movie before and after and see the difference in dialog, jokes, etc.

  • So true, so true . . .

  • That's bared skin. It was a lot more sexual than people think these days.

  • Wow, those were some risque costumes! Were they really showing that much skin, or were they wearing flesh-colored body stockings? Hard to tell.

  • My God, the TRUST t hese women needed to have in their partners, to make some of htose moves. Incredible.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more