JT Gatto is, along with Charlotte Iserbyt, one of the most prominent researchers on the subject of global education. In this interview, Mr. Gatto summarizes the origins and purposes of the modern (UNESCO-run) educational apparatus.
The current system is meant to create a dumbed down, apathetic, easily manageable, global population; one that will not oppose being enslaved, under a world UN-corporate system, for the benefit of the dominant global hierarchy of world bankers and 'establishment' families.
When almost everyone in the 'worker' classes is placid, apathetic, highly suggestible, and technically illiterate, they're not much of a threat to the establishment, are they? Well, that's the whole point of it. Imprisoning the human mind inside a cocoon of gullibility and ignorance, in order to create a global society of perfect worker bees to serve their global corporate masters, see.
You should also watch Charlotte Iserbyt's interview on the topic of education and social engineering. She also goes further than JT Gatto into the full extent and character of the global tyranny that is being ushered in. Here's the link to that interview's playlist: http://www.youtube.com/user/LibertyTruthJustice#g/c/EFBFA5E7A1D4C0AC
download and read Mrs. Charlotte Iserbyt's excellent "Deliberate Dumbing Down" book, as well as other materials, on her websites:
http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com
http://www.americandeception.com
Also read the books by the first Director-General of UNESCO, eugenicist and Nazi-sympathizer Julian Huxley, particularly "UNESCO: It's Purpose and its Philosophy".
He is quite clear in explaining you the purpose of our current global educational system:
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000681/068197eo.pdf
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. lf you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
America's fear of communism is laughable.
I am unsure of why I am watching this.
Also Julian Huxley was not a Nazi sympathiser, he was in fact anti-Nazi, just because he recognised eugenics as something (which he believed) would play a crucial part of the not to distant future.
I am unsure why I even watched 3minutes and 52 seconds of this video, possible for the entertainment...
tehnoobsaurus 1 month ago
@tehnoobsaurus
Why would such a pompous and superior character like you even bother to comment on this? Let alone to state, "I'm bored, ah-ah". Don't pompous superior characters have more snappy, even snobish things to do with time?
So, let's have a polite gufaw, while we reflect on the merits of dialectical materialist time expenditure.
Regardless, even superior ah-ah people should read more books; particularly those by closet Nazis like Julian Huxley - they're quite informative.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 month ago
@LibertyTruthJustice Allow me to retract some of my comments. When I checked your reply I forgot to close the tab, the video began to play, as it progressed, I realised I agreed with a few of the points that Gatto makes, however I still disagree with Huxley being a Nazi, also I disagree with it being entirely UNESCO fault, I believe that it is also the "government of which ever country you want to make an example of's" fault.
tehnoobsaurus 1 month ago
@tehnoobsaurus
The thing with Julian Huxley is that he was a hardline eugenicist and a Fabian Socialist, which are one and the same thing [on these things particular I'd suggest, for example, "Anticipations", by HG Wells; you can see where Hitler got all his ideas from]. The main difference with Nazism was that the Nazis were actually more open! -- wanting rapid, brutal action, for the benefit of Germany. The Fabians wanted (and got) a gradual, internationalist approach.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 month ago
@tehnoobsaurus (2)
But the differences here are essentially simbolic and contextual. It can not be forgotten than it was the Cliveden Set/Milner Group, in which the Socialists and Huxley's Eugenics Society were heavily invested, that encouraged the Nazis during the 30s, including in foreign trade, through the Anglo-German Fellowship/Bank of England/City of London complex.
After the war, Huxley merely helped carry eugenics to the global institutional sphere -- UN, IUCN, Unesco,etc.
LibertyTruthJustice 1 month ago