Rush BU2B Brought up to Believe (in Evolution) with lyrics

Rush BU2B Brought up to Believe (in Evolution) Neil Peart philosophy religion evolution creation intelligence. Lies taught in school, Clockwork Angels, Time Machine Tour, Geddy Lee Alex Lifeson lyrics 2112

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Clockwork Angels
• Time Machine Tour
• Rush
• BU2B
• Evolution
• Brought up to Believe
• Neil Peart
• Creation
• Alex Lifeson
• Geddy
• Lee
• 2112
• Lyrics
• lies
• religion
• philosophy

[bytor765]

Evolution = Swiss Cheese

[bytor765]

SCIENCE LIKE NATURE MUST ALSO BE TAMED!!!!!!!!!!!

[bytor765]

These quotes are from evolutionists, when they honestly look at the theory they realize it isn't a given fact, there are many problems.

[SqueakerAlpha]

ok, the quotes are just bad. If my students asked the one on chemical reactions in the cell I would send him to the library to work it out. If one cell forms and is viable , you eventually get billions of the same cell. You dont need lots of seperate animals all evolving a basic cell at once , you start with a working cell and go from there. Finish the Darwin eye quote. Next sentance please. Thats a lie of omission , and if you are christian , you go to hell for it.

[RizzleMcRizz]

You seem like a real fan, but how any fan could so blatantly misinterpret their lyrics, use them to push an agenda, then proceed to chop up and disgrace the song in question is beyond all and any understanding.

[IANSPA]

One more thing Geddy doesn't believe in a God either.



[TehCondor]

@RushOnAMission87 California Ensatina Salamanders - there's your observed evolution. Additionally, the Theory of Evolution IS NOT abiogenesis. Non-living matter producing "life" has nothing to do with living things changing over time.

[TehCondor]

@RushOnAMission87 You simply MUST be trolling now. Just google "observed instances of speciation" to find observed examples of evolution in action. And no, theories do not have to be directly observed - for example, we can observe the effects of evolution in the fossil record, taxonomy, genetics, etc. Additionally, it matters not what one scientist believed - that doesnt make it right. Not to mention that Albert Einstein did not believe in a personal god and it has no bearing on evolution anyhow

[IANSPA]

@RushOnAMission87 There is no evidence he exists that is the evidence.

Now i wait for your next delusional statement in which i expect you to give evidence that he does. And don't make the same mistake as the other misguided fools Einstein did not believe in God.

[RushOnAMission87]

@TehCondor a theory has to be observed and tested the only thing its been tested on is viruses and micro organisms you still haven't conducted a test on a live human being. ALBERT EINSTEIN BELIEVED IN GOD he's revered as one of the greatest if not the greatest scientific mind of all time. oh yeah the Director of the US Department of Science and Scientific Sesearch happens to be a Christian too.

[RushOnAMission87]

@IANSPA ha ha ha no but your stupidity and lack of evidence is. LET ME ASK YOU WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT GOD DOESN'T EXIST

[RushOnAMission87]

@TehCondor Hey check the definition of theory and you'll find out that a theory has to be observed. I've never seen anything evolve. that would make it a model.You also kinda confused me with 1st statement. my point is Non living matter can't produce life.It's that simple

[IANSPA]

Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact. Evolution is fact.... IS IT SINKING IN YET.

[TehCondor]

@RushOnAMission87 I will reiterate my first statement: Your use of the word theory suggests a profound misunderstanding of the scientific method in general.

A Theory is not a hunch, guess or conjecture. In science, a Theory is just about as close to fact as you can get. Gravity is indeed a theory, as are the existence of atoms(atomic theory), germs(germ theory), the sun being at the center of the solar system(heliocentric theory, or just heliocentrism).

[TehCondor]

@RushOnAMission87 I have a hard time believing that someone could be this obtuse. As I said one year ago on this very page, "holes" in a theory do not immediately disqualify it. Where are all of these "great Scientific minds" refuting evolution? They don't exist. Abiogenesis has not yet been observed, but that has no bearing on whether or not it happened a billion years ago on a very different Earth, if that's how life began on this planet. That, in turn, has no bearing on evolutionary theory.

[RushOnAMission87]

@TehCondor yeah and your Dillusional You also took what I said out of context. my point is that sponteniously generated life is impossible science has tried many times and failed every time. which mean Darwinistic Evolution is impossible. It uses bad science with many inconsistincies and will break scientific laws to prove their point. Why do you think great Scientific minds are turning away from Darwin, it's because of what I just pointed out

[BeowulfVids]

@RushOnAMission87, Thermodynamic Law 1 only counts IN A CLOSED SYSTEM.

[BeowulfVids]

@RushOnAMission87, if you say that the only reason you disagree with the theory is because we're mettling with god, then there is no logically convincing you.

[RushOnAMission87]

@BeowulfVids Thermodynamic Law 1. Matter can niether be created nor destroyed God does not abide by our rules. I have no problem with Science until it tries to meddle in God's affairs and, yes Macro Evolution has been disproven just buy incosistencies and the breaking of scientific laws

[RushOnAMission87]

@BeowulfVids 1st of all moran.Gravity is real and not a theory, if your gonna call gravity a theory than I guess my foot is also a theory. There are 3 types of evolution Macro ,Micro and Theolistic. the one you described is Micro Evolution, I have no problem with micro evolution, it's Macro Evolution that Darwin wrote about. Which is not possible without breaking the laws of Thermodynamics.

[fendergibs]

@BeowulfVids it has nothing to do with the current vaccine, and gravity is a disotrtion of space.

[TehCondor]

@RushOnAMission87 Can't tell if troll. Thanks for responding to my year-old comment with your pointless drivel. Abiogenesis has absolutely nothing to do with a dead woman producing offspring.

Nothing is unfathomable, but some concepts are far more likely to be correct than others. Some concepts have evidence in support of them. Clearly you are in fact as uneducated as you've been told.

[BeowulfVids]

@RushOnAMission87, also I would like to point out that my '(as far as we know)' means that it can be disproved at any time.

[BeowulfVids]

I realized I said you're instead of your, my phone tends to do that.

[BeowulfVids]

@RushOnAMission, there is evidence of evolution. Why do you think they make a new vaccine for the flu every year? It's because the virus changes and adapts to the current vaccine. I also never said that a theory is a fact, it's just an idea that can be changed. Gravity is a theory, but we can't know it's right, because somewhere gravity might not exist as a force. Also, don't make ad hominem attacks because it makes you're argument less valid.

[RushOnAMission87]

@TehCondor Let me ask you ask a question. Can a dead woman have kids? NO so therefore a single celled organism spontaneously generating from non living matter and creating all the complex life and the complexities within the lifeforms cells, The Human Brain etc. is an unfathamable impossibility.this is why I love when evolutionists say were uneducated because I get to pull out scienctific laws and a bunch other evidence, and SPEW A LOAD OF SCIENTIFIC CUM ALL OVER YOUR PRECIOUS EVOLUTION

[RushOnAMission87]

@IndulgeHomeDecorCom  Awesome dude Right on

[RushOnAMission87]

@BeowulfVids You cant belive in both you have to pick, and The laws of science go against Evolution. The Bible is right, not just the Gospels but Genesis too.