XNA Physics Tests

3 simple physics tests using XNA and C#. No external physics libaries were used, meaning these samples are able to be run at comparable framerates on the 360 (30-60 fps). Physics implementation based on work by oliii (see gamedev.net).

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• XNA
• Physics
• video
• game
• computer
• cube

[mychokehold]

@Craisor1 I went to Physics class once... I LEARNED ABOUT EVERYTHING! One class was dedicated to ordering taco bell properly. Fail.

[Craisor1]

@mychokehold Hahaha, Fail my ass, EVERYTHING is physics.

[mychokehold]

@Craisor1 HAHA FAIL!

[Craisor1]

@mychokehold you are an idiot, everything is 'physics'. Stuff moving to the left - physic, stuff falling - physic, get over your gta4 and your SR1-2, thats a lot of physics in a game, but those he showed are PHYSICS.

[PseudoNocturnal]

@mychokehold Okay, no gravity, but working collision, which is hard to implement in xna. I just get sick of people making disparaging comments to people posting their experiments, as if writing a working collision system isn't a major challenge. I think its the snideness I take offense at. You could instead have said "Why don't you try improving the gravity by (at a basic level) incrementing say x while falling, and subtracting it from y." Then the comment sounds far more constructive.

[mychokehold]

@PseudoNocturnal Yeah, the only definition, sorry, The law of physics. Collision isn't physics, nor is "stuff bouncing off of stuff" which is just collision, and I don't see gravity, just a steady Y--; woo.

[PseudoNocturnal]

@mychokehold Gravity, collision and stuff bouncing off of stuff... You have another definition of game physics?

[mychokehold]

LOL this isnt physics

[luketheduke0]

How did you calculate the torque on the boxes?

[miketrejo1234]

Cool good job ,I dont know but you could improve it with a better inercy transeference