Introducing KODAK VISION3 200T Color Negative Film 5213/7213
Top Comments
All Comments (16)
-
@TheHandOfFear Thanks you so much!
-
@lightshunters Not really. People try to imitate it digitally, but I have yet to see something better than "sorta looks like it".
If you want this look you need to shoot film. And if you really want THIS look you need to shoot THIS particular film stock (5213). Don't be afraid of film, it EASIER to shoot than digital (despite what some might say) and the results speak for themselves.
-
It's possible apply this color tonality in Digital Photography with Photoshop???
Some suggestion? - Thanks!
-
@numanuma20 none. Video is video. You need a profissional movie camera por 35mm, but there are several 16mm and 8mm amateur cameras, search ebay.
-
How many megapixels are those yellows, reds, greens, magentas, violets, earth, etc?
-
What video camera uses film ?
Entering the 2nd decade of the 21st Century, one might be apt to label film a dying medium. What with the advent of glorified camcorders boasting 5k resolution, combined with their ability to churn out cheap albeit muddy-looking 3-D, why would anyone bother shooting on 35mm? In reality, try as hard as they may, the actual resolution of these digital wonder cameras is in reality 2k with an added 3k of Bayer Interpolation guesstimating the remaining information. Film = 6k-10k actual resolution.
pH4nTomPL4n3T 3 months ago 3
For those who can afford the stock and development costs, NOTHING beats the warm look of film, and in this area, Kodak continues to be the platinum standard. Naturally, great optics and talented cinematographers help make these images as beautiful as they are. Even so, the great advances in digital cameras have made excellent image quality accessible to budget filmmakers, and will continue to improve. But as the saying goes: "The last of the old beats the first of the new."
freakybuzz 4 months ago 2