Gemulator Demo Video Part #1

Introducing Gemulator, the Atari ST emulator for MS-DOS and Windows 3.1. Brought to you by http://www.emulators.com/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• atari
• st
• emulator

[oc5nsli341nforce4]

Wow those were the days, 8bit isa.

[C9H17NO5]

Why even comment on a video you have no interest in, go play ball or something.

Nice video, thanks !

[dampierer]

que remenbers me trae esas computadoras

[dampierer]

tu pc funciona a 33 mhz ?

[nhking4]

i have Win7 x64 - is it compatiable?

[deepblue69uk]

@gamewizard You are correct as far as the 16bit data bus goes and how it interacts with memory. However, the fact is still there that it is a 16/32bit processor and not simply a 16bit processor. :-) Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered with 32bit registers.

[gamewizard]

@deepblue69uk

A chip is only as fast as it's slowest part. It can still only pull data from RAM in 16-bit chunks regardless of how it is set up internally. I know how a 68000 is constructed inside and machines like the Atari ST and early Amigas and Macs were considered part of the 16-bit generation of home computers along with the 8086 and 80286 PC's.

[deepblue69uk]

@Paradician Alas not. :-)

[deepblue69uk]

@Paradician I think I'd rather take your word for it because you've actually programmed in assembler. That is pretty hardcore. :-)

[deepblue69uk]

@xnonsuchx If you mean features as in the registers, yes, it was 32bit. They are rather the main parts of the cpu. However, it had a 16bit data bus and therefore the best way to think of it is a crippled 32bit processor. :-)

[deepblue69uk]

@gamewizard You're only half right. The Motorola was a 16/32 bit processor. It had 32bit wide registers and a 16bit data bus. Hence, it was actually both in many respects. So a 32bit processor bottlenecked by it's own data bus. :-) Later models such as the 68020 and 68030 had 32bit data buses and therefore could be considered true 32bit processors. :-)

[cenadaveen]

1992 WTF!