The vote to NOT let people READ bills

The vote to NOT let people READ bills BEFORE Passage
Senate Finance Committee Markup of Health Care Bill
Who voted to NOT ALLOW the legislative language be posted for voters to READ what the Health Care Bill accually says BEFORE the vote? AND Why won't they let us read it? They say it is because it will 'confuse' us.
The real reason is that there isn't time to use the NULEAR OPTION unless they pass it before OCT 15th. And the true cost will take 2 weeks for the CBO to complete the cost markup. If they are going to shove it down our throats their time is limited. And maybe they don't want you to know the true cost either.
watch for yourself on CSPAN3
Who voted NO? to a 72 hour post of the bills?
BAUCUS, Max (D-MT)
ROCKEFELLER(D-WV)
CONRAD(D-ND)
BINGAMAN(D-NM)
KERRY(D-MA)
WYDEN(D-OR)
SCHUMER(D-NY)
STABENOW(D-MI)
CANTWELL(D-WA)
NELSON(D-FL)
MENENDEZ(D-NJ)
CARPER Thomas(D-DE)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• NO
• votes
• healthcare
• cost
• Baucus

[Gramma4America]

to:KLisaLisa, the numbers are listed, call your people DON'T BE SILENT - BE HEARD

[MrBullfrog9876]

They vote NO when it comes to informing us of there deep dark secrets-----We will vote NO when the next election comes around. MARK MY WORDS. WE ARE FED UP.

[mike1111qq]

the charman votes NO.... remember this and vote accordingly... this makes me sick...

[KLisaLisa]

Pitiful! Let the people read the bill before you vote on it! You may not want to read it, but we do!