Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Coal, tar sands and Copenhagen Pt.3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,149
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 2, 2009

If USA, Canada and China are committed to oil and coal, what will Copenhagen accomplish?

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • allowing wall st to trade anything always breeds corruption and mis-management. they will make cap and trade into a derivatives game.

  • Thanks for the reply.  I was trying to be optimistic.

see all

All Comments (71)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • oh God this woman should kill herself - save some carbon!

  • Conservatives are so stupid that they find winter a discovery every year.

  • Ofc global warming exists,its December and im freezing! xD

  • COal is too damaging tothe environment since the companies are doing Mountiantop removal to get it.

  • It's sad when a local B.C. electric car company (Dynasty Electric Vehicle Limited) is able to sell more vehicles to Florida then all of Canada combined. It's legal in 47 states and only 1 province.

  • The Pentagon receintly concluded climate change is the biggest threat to political stability in the years to come so how the hell are these" climate gate " delay tactics by fossil fuel revenue depedent governments able to go on unchallenged!

    We need an announcement ASAP by us energy sec. Steven Chu, Al Gore ,Dr Hansen to clear up these stolen ipcc emails and put the matter to rest once a d for all!

  • If you actually look at the real science, not the lies and BS put out by the 'Carbon Tax' profiteers.

    If you were talking about any other element than Carbon and Oxygen I'd say sure. But excess CO2 is the big crime supporting global warming? Bullshit.

    yeah, its warming...we are also moving away from an ice age... duh... that's how it works.

    The impact they are talking about wont even take effect for 800 years - look it up.

    I wish more of you 'activist' actually read. Haven't you learned?

  • Well it sounds like you have all the answers, I'm sure you have done your research. I have actually read a book or two on the subject and don't get all my education from the TV and Internet.

    Its scientifically logical - more CO2 increases plant size and production. They have used this in greenhouses for years (CO2 Generators ...look it up) and prehistorically there was an enormous amount of extra CO2 in the air which is why Dinosaurs grew so large as did everything.

    Ah, it CO2 didn't kill them

  • @PsyogiBottoms

    Hah, checked your profile really quick.

    I hadn't thought you were that naive.

    A fake petition together by a tobacco lobbyist, and a conspiracy theorist at a medical institute, with zero background checks on credentials.

    You actually find that sort of thing to be compelling?

    greyfalcon. net/ oism

    greyfalcon. net/ oism2

  • @PsyogiBottoms

    You do realize that in that video, it is constantly referencing peer reviewed physical science journals, right?

    Where does your "proven" come from?

    Also, let me ask.

    Over the past 40 years. Has increasingly less infrared radiation been escaping into space?

    greyfalcon. net/ greenhouse

    It's a simple question.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more