The Reason Geerup is so Angry About the DMCA

I'm sure that I am not the first person to realize this, but hopefully Geerup will admit his real feelings!

Ha... too funny.

------
Some links of choice:

Geerup's channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/geerup

Geerup's video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVU2iD2hVE0

Disabledchicken spits in the face of people trying to help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHNda-Ak7U0

junosden
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzlNWCOVwe8

(until the reply is added) Vogter2100's video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-TK6UVFlHU


Enjoy.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• geerup
• false
• dmca
• asking
• help
• anger
• religion
• theist
• atheist

[ThatOneQuestion]

You were already told not to bother speaking on this after your humiliation 3 weeks ago. You are blocked.

.

Why you have this stick up your ass about your own inability to understand law I dont know. Keep your bullshit to yourself, especially if you dont know what you are talking about.

[MemeCrusher]

@MemeCrusher the penalty not perjury, it is simply that damages are owed, see 512 f and stfu idiot!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@MemeCrusher

And since you pressed the issue and made me find the specific line in the law that indeed proves it is a crime, I'll add that to my intro.

Thanks.

[ThatOneQuestion]

And by the way, you fucking idiot, get your damn facts straight.

17 usc 512 C 3 A vi

"A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. "

Do not speak about this again, kid.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Oh so you dont think someone claiming they have legally binding rights to something they dont isn't a crime?

Try actually thinking, idiot.

DMCA claims are about copyright, and abusing that to censor people is blatantly lying in order to censor.

Do you think ANY judge will ever be just fine with someone saying perjury is not a problem? Nice try again, but you fail.

[MemeCrusher]

@ThatOneQuestion i am giving it to you straight up. see 17usc512f. the penalty for filing an improper dmca notice filed by a content owner is civil not criminal. criminal penalties do apply to false counter notices (see and compare 512gc3), but the notice itself is not filed under penalty of perjury. vfx's prob was he encouraged others to file false claims. a whole nother kettle of fish. no lies here. get it right.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"falsely claiming to be the owner of allegedly infringing material is not a crime under the dmca."

Oh right, so then VenomFangX didn't actually need to apologize to the internet for maliciously abusing the system and the other people he filed against didn't actually have any legal recourse?

Lie like that again and you will be blocked. I'm not going to waste my time with fools on my own channels.

[MemeCrusher]

falsely claiming to be the owner of allegedly infringing material is not a crime under the dmca.

[TheTruthPusher]

Why are there no instructions on how to withdraw a DMCA?

Youtube makes it easy to file one, but imposible to locate it, or the progress of it, or anything about it, especially if you want to withdraw it, WTF is that about?

[christinepeace]

Awesome just fucking awesome.

Cheers Christine