Health News | Outdoor Secondhand Smoke
Top Comments
All Comments (44)
-
Poppycock! I like that they don't say that the study also found negligible exposure at 6 feet. And instantaneous exposure at high levels is not the same as chronic exposure all the time to outdoor pollution from cars and power plants, etc. If instantaneous exposure mattered then no one would be getting Xrays at the doctor or dentist.
-
@jcomd The general mortality count associated with active smoking and secondhand smoke I gather comes not from any real science, but rather hand picked statistics.
-
1:14 "The closer you are to the smoke, the larger amount of inhalation." WOW! What a novel finding! lmfao
-
seems like more than you have. get an education, seriously. you are so self-conscious that you actually deleted your comment in fears of being further made fun of, or you knew you were blatenly wrong. fail sir.
-
wow you have one freind congratz
-
i dont think anyone here likes you.
do yourself a favor, man and get an education. tobacco kills brah.
-
And thus, I win.
-
actually that guy does have a point. you really did sound stupid when you said the government was lying about tobacco being dangerous.
-
hey get out of here no one likes you
all you do is start shit with people..... go read a book or something and leave youtube for a while
and im not gonna even reply to anything you anymore
BLOCKED
This is ridiculous. This is not a "study" but a propaganda piece.Inhaling 50x the particulate matter in second hand smoke SOUNDS scary but he never mentions actual morbidity or mortality figures. Using his measuring tools, he could just as well stand on a roadside and measure high numbers. Another scare tactic. Use your white matter people!
jcomd 3 years ago 6
Pure garbage!
VS120sfan 4 years ago 3