SEPTEMBER CLUES addendum CHAPTER1

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

The SEPTEMBER CLUES forum: http://www.cluesforum.info

No videos of the 9/11 events can be trusted. Not even the shots depicting the tower collapses. Various techniques were used to 'sell' the events of 9/11 with computer-generated imagery.

In my September Clues research, it was demonstrated that all existing videoclips showing 'airplanes' striking the Twin Towers are forgeries. That should of course suffice to call the entire 9/11 TV 'coverage' a total fraud. However, this 'Addendum' to September Clues serves to understand just how much of the 9/11 TV hoax relied on fake, manipulated or even pre-fabricated imagery.

Before you comment on this latest study, ask yourself one simple question :

Would it have been wise for the 9/11 planners to rig power explosives (or use any sort of weaponry) to bring down the WTC complex - and let anyone capture these erratic 'fireworks' on film? Would they not ensure that the DEPICTION of this high-risk demolition-job be kept away from public view - and instead offer the World TV audience 'safe', artificial visuals of the day's events ? Plain logic suggests that, given the magnitude of this operation and the resources available to their planners, all risk factors would have been kept to a bare minimum : all the available technology would have been employed towards achieving this end.

Of course, the WTC towers must have collapsed in a spectacular manner - but not quite in the fanciful, unseemly manner seen on TV(top down collapse) : in reality, a thick smokescreen probably impeded any clear view of their demise - which was never recorded on film. In fact, dozens of charred stationary vehicles were found on all streets leading to the WTC ( way out of reach of any falling debris ). One may reasonably speculate they were set on fire to help blocking the streetview of the WTC during the hour or so preceding their collapse.

To be sure, the available collapse videos (much as the 'planecrash' videos) depict physically impossible events and have, to this day, effectively confounded any scientific calculations - as they are based on fictitious imagery. However, foul play can be fully demonstrated by exposing the glaring discrepancies between the videos themselves : they contain verifiable, repeatable and demonstrable proof - and as such constitute eminently court-admissible evidence.




ABOUT EMP/HERF(or HPM) electromagnetic weaponry :
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/the-dawn-of-the-ebomb
There can be no denying that the development of EMP/HERF technology has been a strategic military priority over the last decades. One of the main features of EMP/HERF weapons is their ability to disrupt - selectively - the enemy's electronic systems. In this video, I contend / postulate that this technology was likely used to disrupt temporarily all videocamera circuitries in a wide radius around Lower Manhattan. (electronic jamming devices can be selectively calibrated to affect a specific hertz range). It has been counter-argued that this would have caused all sorts of disruptions in other electronic appliances. Well, that is exactly what was officially reported: we know that all cellphones were down that morning, that all local Tv stations blacked out and that a huge controversy raised by the fire department firefighters' centered around the fact that their radio-transmitters severely malfunctioned. One could reasonably speculate this was due to some 'bleeding' of the EMP/HERF jamming devices, thus affecting a range of similar HZ-range electronics.

Theoretically, a total videocamera jamming/blackout was only needed for a few, crucial seconds of the day (tower strikes+tower collapses). Nevertheless, it seems likely it was applied throughout the 102 minutes of the morning events (+ in the afternoon at the time of the WTC7 collapse ) to prevent ANY private footage to record the events as they unfolded IN REALITY.

In any event, it should be clear that the various videos betray irreconcilable discrepancies. It is up to everyone's logic to make sense out of the imagery we were fed on 9/11by the major TV networks. With the available evidence now at hand, the most reasonable conclusion is that all of the 9/11 TV 'newscasts' were but a series of pre-fabricated, digital fabrications.



*
For more info & updates about this ongoing research, please go to :
http://www.cluesforum.info

Thanks for your interest and support of this longstanding research.

Simon Shack

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• september
• clues
• cbs
• cnn
• fox
• abc
• bush
• obama
• twin
• towers
• collapse

[simonshack]

You may start by watching these 2 short videos

WHERE ARE THE 9/11 VICTIMS?: watch?v=vjlkF9DlImI

9/11 Victims Not Registered As Dead By Social Security:

watch?v=HckSSIGt50Q

You may then do a google search for these two articles of mine:

search keywords are:

deconstructing 9/11 september clues

the memorial scams september clues

Make up your own mind. The research is out there - and it overwhelmingly suggests the alleged "9/11 victims" were digitally-generated, fictitious identities.

[msRabbit1984]

you still don't talk about the people inside the towers... don't tell me they were fake because it is impossible that no single soul showed to work just that day... PEOPLE DIED! maybe not in aircrafts but they DID DIE!

[simonshack]

@msRabbit1984 If it makes you feel better to believe so, go ahead. The fact is that the WTC was entirely emptied of its historical tenants after the first alleged "AlQuaeda" bombing in 1993 - and subsequently repopulated with a few companies - all in on the 9/11 hoax. There is now overwhelming evidence that the "victims" were created in the virtual domain. Do a google search for "Why are 3000 9/11 victims missing from federal death registry" To get started, watch?v=HckSSIGt50Q

[simonshack]

@msRabbit1984 Next (if you are interested in the issue of the fake victims) you may enter my website septemberclues.info and read these two articles of mine: "The MEMORIAL SCAMS" and "DECONSTRUCTING 9/11". For an in-depth analysis of the 9/11 online memorials, there is also the 80-page PDF by my fellow researcher 'Hoi Polloi' - called "THE VICSIM REPORT". Happy reading! :O)

[simonshack]

@punishalltrolls Yes, I have indeed. Among the things I've been told (condensed for brevity): A - "I was out on the street just North of the WTC at 8:46AM and just heard a bang. NO airplane flew over me". B - "I was just North of the WTC and my video camera would simply not function. I was violently shoved away by police officers. Back home, the camera worked fine again." C: "I was planning to take the Path subway to the WTC that morning, but it was shut down - allegedly due to a union strike."

[yarbi1]

Thank God you took the time to do this.... God help us all...

[Conflagration2100]

A video news release (VNR), is a video segment made to look like a news report, but is instead created by a PR firm, advertising agency, marketing firm, corporation, or government agency. They are provided to television newsrooms to shape public opinion, promote commercial products and services, publicize individuals, or support other interests. Critics of VNRs have called the practice deceptive or a propaganda technique, particularly when the segment is not identified to the viewers as a VNR.

[DanCrofter]

What really happened: Bush was looking at child porn on his computer in one of the WTC's and forgot to delete his internet history. He remembered after leaving, but couldn't remember which building he was in. Drastic measures were taken.

[KingLeipzig]

@simonshack

Its not only 911 its also the columbine massacre and other events that was on other countrys.

[ilcoun]

Hi Simon I've been watching your September Clues now and I have to say, it's good. I like the analysis etc. But you say that no one died on 9/11? That's crazy! What about the firefighters in WTC? What about the people who worked there? The conspiracy theory about the missiles maybe make sense, but that's all. People died there. No doubts.

[MrStrman]

This all makes much more sense than what we were hearing from the media. I am pretty well shocked by no planes at all. I feel a new song coming on. I may have been wrong when I wrote the first one on Building 7 which you can hear by clicking on my name.