Solution to the Problem of Internet Pornography
Top Comments
All Comments (108)
-
@Terrakinetic ARE YOU SERIOUS ? Sorry I dont put any importance on periods or quotations commas or whatever Have you ever read the poem100 years from now ? You should so you could understand what is and what is not important Have a good life now please Stop the replies and complaints
-
@ArtByLindaLee I see. You're one of those people that automatically brands those who don't agree with them. If you still can't understand why people are afraid of letting the already proven corrupt politicians gain more control over our lives then you're right, there is no point arguing.
On a side note, you're only one person; you can only be 100% for something. Secondly, please use periods for the sake of the readers. I'm sure you can shorten your comments by 5 or 7 characters.
-
@Terrakinetic You obviously support pornography I DON'T This is the difference between us from start Let's agree to disagree Be mature to accept other people opinions even when they are conflictual to your own I believe we need to do everything to keep kids safe Why not have separate ports Why should kids be on a channel/port that has adult content ? No more argument please realize we both have different views on this
-
@ArtByLindaLee Are you honestly telling me parents aren't capable of parenting their own children and now they NEED the government to intervene and help? Hell, why don't they just cut off your family's media access altogether? Then there's a 100% chance your children won't be exposed to anything. They'll be completely safe and sheltered until they're 18 and ignorant of the world. Or you can go and help parents EDUCATE children so they'll be fortified and able to defend themselves morally.
-
@Terrakinetic I DISAGREE This is needed Yes it should be defined I understand your argument that who would defined what is acceptable there are many that would not want this because they have saturated everything around us Bombarded us with advertisement and are found in most places such as personal adds We must put the safety of children priority they are the future and deserve respect .love and safety We need to exclude children from all that content I AM 1000% for this
-
Normal people do not have to endure pornography, because they can choose for themselves not to watch pornography. They are not restrained and forced to watch it, nor does it magically appear on their screen.
If they choose to browse shady sites and then get offended and want society to protect them from themselves, then they are not "normal" people. They are either zealots or they have problems controlling their own behaviors and don't want to take responsibility .
-
@Flare400 Why do normal people have to endure others that choose deviant behaviors Its not fair that NORMAL people have to be exposed to pornography
-
I already said what the problems are. You might as well lay off the CAPS LOCK button and stop screaming like a lunatic, since it is only you who is having a problem paying attention to what is being written by others.
If you want a constantly monitored porn-free network, then build one yourselves for yourselves. The world doesn't owe you exorbitant resources to satisfy your paranoia. Most people are fine with the status quo and can monitor their kids as well as themselves.
-
@ArtByLindaLee I AGREE 100000000000000000000%
-
@Flare400 NO ITS NOT ........... KIDS NEED TO BE PROTECTED AT ALL MEASURES WHY SO MANY KIDS DIE BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T CARE OR FIND EXCUSES TO AVOID DOING THE RIGHT THING OR THEIR OWN SELFISHNESS
It's over optimistic to think that you can relegate "all" porn on to another channel. You'd have to define what is porn and completely redraw the borders, and then you'd infringe on beliefs and rights of innumerable people.
Worst of all I believe is the possibility for politicians to exploit channels like this and censor political dissidents and alternative news networks.
What's defined as "offensive" easily crossing into the boundaries of politics, thus offering a tool for a police state
Terrakinetic 2 years ago 17
@Terrakinetic
Agreed this video is so incredibly naive. It would take enormous resources to categorize all the data on the net, requiring thousands of monitors and billions of dollars. Also when it comes to government censorship, the slippery slope fallacy does not apply - there's mission creep in almost every government initiative. Besides, aren't there already parental control programs out there - making this irrelevant anyway?
This Protecting the Children™ argument is just a weak excuse.
Flare400 9 months ago 10