Richard Dawkins' Blind Faith in William Lane Craig's Non-Existent CV

...seriously backfires when confronted with evidence over anecdote!

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Richard
• Dawkins
• Liar
• Ad
• hominem
• Sheldonian
• coward
• Reasonable
• Faith
• Tour
• Christianity
• The
• God
• Delusion
• Peter
• Millican
• Cosmological
• Argument
• CV
• Guardian
• Why
• Refuse
• to
• debate
• Quentin
• Smith
• Grayling
• Daniel
• Dennett

[Drgamedood]

How long will you keep beating a dead horse, Birdieupon?

[Birdieupon]

@Drgamedood

So long as this dead horse continues to weasel his way out of his responsibilities by using ad hominems and lies, I'll be there to expose and parody him.

What you need realise, Drgame, is that it is YOU who are beating a dead horse by trying to pretend that there's really nothing to talk about here. If you're "bored" of my criticizing Dawkins then don't watch (or comment) on my videos... but Dawkins is a coward and a sleaze, and I'm not leaving him alone until he shapes up.

[m1chae15]

@DigitalDecadence Well, here's to better argumentation then. Truth wins, or there's no such. If the Atheists are correct, we'll never know, and if they aren't, there will be less excuse. Nice to see someone else, even an 'enemy', tire of blatant rubbish of whatever stripe. I much prefer the old school Atheists myself. Something more than junk food. Both sides have their "Why are there still monkeys?" moments.

[AtheistApologetics]

@Jesrael1986M "But yeah, I do think the case for design is so airtight that denying it is like saying the sky isn't blue."

How about you provide some evideince for that claim, other the standard argument from incredulity that you cannot understand it thus it cannot be so? You also need to explain why all professional scientific organizations and education institutions reject ID, other than the absurd claim of a "consipracy". That is not only illogical it is laughable.

[AtheistApologetics]

@Jesrael1986M Actually the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania *already* made "mincemeat" out of Behe, the Discovery Institute and several others in the Kitzmiller-v-Dover trial. If you read the court's decision as well as the transcripts, (I have) not only was ID shown *not* to be science, but Behe and the Discovery Istitute were shown to be completely dishonest. If ID were true, that would not be necessary.

[ClumsyRoot]

@Birdieupon

By the way, I freely acknowledge that Craig would eviscerate Dawkins in a debate. Dawkins is a rather poor spokesperson for atheism, and Craig often runs circles around opponents who are not professional philosophers themselves.

I suggest you watch Craig's informal "debate" with Shelly Kagan. Craig doesn't do well outside of the traditional debate format--he can't rely on his usual sophistry--and Kagan very neatly exposed the many flaws in Craig's arguments.

[ClumsyRoot]

@Bigjon145

And what about Craig? He's easily as prideful and arrogant as Dawkins.

Both men could use a little good old fashioned humility.

[mysticjbyrd]

You people are delusional...

Nothing to see here but strawman attacks folks.