WTC 7 and a Chinese Skyscraper which did NOT collapse

Updated- Obama said "These are not opinions to be debated, these are facts" in reference to who he wants us to believe did 9/11. so basically Obama is calling for an end to 9/11 conspiracy theories, well how about at end to the silence about explosives being in WTC 7 as a safety measure? Or maybe they were planted? It is one or the other. WTC 7 collapsed differently to the Twin Towers. Maybe a weapon which causes molecular dissociation was used here as well. But, I know this, when you compare the fires of WTC 7 and the Chinese Skyscraper there is NO way WTC 7 should have collapsed and collapse the way it did.

Thankyou to the users Xenomorph911, 911veritas, AssociatedPress, beorn and the news channels for these clips.

extra tags

nwo new world order age illuminati 9/11 911 WTC non lethal direct energy weapon sound acoustic meteorological frequency scalar exotic weaponry DEW EW ELF field hutchison effects magnetic anti gravity zero point technology MTHEL tesla coil haarp hurricane erin army navy secret black project cold fusion program fake hoax scam exposed thermate molten metal WTC7 demolition media mind control brainwash truth movement lies propaganda psy op ops controlled opposition casimir quantum physics

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 91177info
• 9/11
• haarp
• exotic
• weapon
• endgame
• false
• flag
• illegal
• war
• new
• york
• 911
• september
• al
• qaeda
• bush
• blair
• iraq
• afghanistan
• inside
• job
• nanothermite
• nanotech
• nanotechnology
• microwave
• terrorism
• agenda
• bin
• laden
• building
• taliban
• on
• terror
• mossad

[ShirakOmegaX]

There was a report filed by an engineer professor Who analyzed the base supports that said there was theramide explosive residue found on the slag I am trying to remember his name however. The evidence suggested controlled demolition. Do we have a sound grab of "Obama calls for an end to 9/11 conspiracy theories," ? I would like to verify this for myself I was hoping that would be in this video. The consensus in Australia was that it was an inside job however thats not what our ownedmedia says

[91177info]

Technically I am incorrect and have understood what he said as such.

Obama said "These are not opinions to be debated, these are facts" in reference to who he wants us to believe did 9/11.

Please see the video titled-

"Obama Warns Not To Challenge Official 9/11 Story"

[skinostra]

@ 91177info Ha Ha of course it wasn't a diesel fire that caused it. That is why I ended it with the "ANY FOOL" tag .

When anything is made to collapse it takes the path of LEAST RESISTANCE not the HIGHEST resistance. All three buildings were DEMOLISHED very very precisely that day. If a terrorist wanted to cause utter mayhem that day and they knew how to demolish a building they would have " BLOWN IT" to cause a domino effect with other buildings . This was clearly a DEMOLITION INSIDE JOB

.

[91177info]

Very good point. The fact they all fell into their own footprint would have made them very disappointed.

I have yet to hear a MSM say it could have been worse, they could have toppled sideways.

Yes, if a terrorist wanted to cause maximum damage they would have flown the planes into the bottom of the building.

But then why would a terrorist group waste their time attacking another country which has nothing to do with them?

They terrorise and fight where they live.

[1loydster]

This whole 9/11 thing has got to come to a head. They have managed to sweep every other treasonous criminal conspiracy under the rug from the Gulf of Tonkin to JFK, so they just expected to sweep this one under that same rug... but there is one major difference - we have the internet now, and this just ain't going away. There is so much totally irrefutable evidence available now; that if you are still defending the 'official 9/11 story' you are either completely ignorant... or you're a traitor.

[urborg74]

I'm sorry but you have to be a blinder wearing fucking moron to still believe the 9/11 official story. Seriously. A FUCKING MORON!

[Agui007]

@corvusyt Spot on :)

[corvusyt]

@rotjesenmatjes I think oil is the least of it. The purpose is to destroy the constitution and subject us all to the whims of the oligarchy. FEMA camps, the "patriot" acts, and the FDAA are the true goals. The rhetoric that we are now being bombarded with to gear us up for invasions of Iran and Syria are the immediate goals of the NWO. BAAA, we'll follow along!

[corvusyt]

@malcomino Have you checked out Dr. Judy Wood's thoughts on this? I am nowhere near competence on directed energy weapons, but she does present some compelling evidence. I also recall reading in Aerospace Weekly and Space Technology a few years ago that a directed energy system was being fitted into a 747 for testing, About a year after 9/11 I read that the project was being decommissioned. It's probably just another coincidence.

[corvusyt]

@aaronmcroy Huh?

[corvusyt]

@stereoarchitect I think this guy is either being paid to be obtrusive or he is brain dead. Either way, no point in talking to his sorry ass.

[corvusyt]

@steven1098s  WOW!

[corvusyt]

@Agui007 Abandon the lamestream media. They're not giving you anything near the truth. Search, find, analyse. Look into the evidence for yourself. There is no way that you can accept the conclusions drawn by others without your own scrutiny. Some things are just outside our expertise and we are unable to draw concrete conclusions. But most of us are pretty capable of recognizing bs when its thrown at us. I think I smell some now (still).

[corvusyt]

@robertdevald No, they'll engineer their own collapses soon enough.

[corvusyt]

@Skeptic121 OOps, sorry, thought you were another troll. Had to read it again before i caught the nuance. I must say though, you did a very good imitation.