Uploader Comments (representativepress)
Top Comments
-
The Constitution is the law of the land and no rule or treaty can supercede it. So all these UN rules, laws, treaties or whatever else they are called are a violation of our Constitution therefore they are Null and Void. I value my Sovereignty and will not allow a bunch of foreign elitists to change our laws that my family fought and died for so we would remain a Constitutional Republic and NOT a Democracy, Oligarchy Socialist, Fascist, or Communist nation.
-
The mainstream media is lieing big time, specifically fox news, cnn and nbc
All Comments (102)
-
Wait, declaring war is a war crime? *scratch head* I think you hurdled over a few steps in your reasoning here.
-
It's simple. TURN OFF YOUR TV. Mainstream media is primarily just federal government propaganda, spewed forth to serve the banking cartels who now own the federal government.
-
RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I am no fan of military action or war with Iran...or anyone else.
However, I have to say that your entire premise for this video is dead wrong, as you interpretation of the Constitution and the UN Charter are dead wrong. Stating that military options are on the table should Iran threaten the US or its allies IS covered by the 'imminent attack' caveat. "Threaten the US" is a vague term which any good lawyer would say means 'imminent attack'. Any reporter who claims otherwise would be an idiot
-
Obama is just as a dictator just as Bush was. They have an agenda against the american pople.
-
antisemitic? you're retarded, what race do you think the speaker here is you brainwashed shitbag.
if anyones a communist it's you. go crawl back into your little hole
-
commie pigs...
-
This video maker tries to gain your trust by borrowing the hard reporting efforts of others, so he can then feed you his disinfo. He uses a chucnk of truth, to sell you some lies elsewhere. Anyone throw up yet?
"Representative Press" = Disinfo.
-
to xyberfunk. OWNED DUMB F*#K start reading more instead of sleeping with your family members and imreeding a dumber generation
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Iran is the chief state sponsor of international terrorism in the world. During a war on terror, the Bush Administration's abject failure to act decisively against Iran is a crime against common sense.
jwoodswce 4 years ago
jwoodswce, "chief state sponsor of international terrorism"? Care to back that up with anything?
But the fact is the US gov has supported terrorism and harbors terrorists, are you saying that any country has a right to bomb the US right now?
If you are sincere in your concerns then there are legal procedures to address those concerns. the US gov refuses to act lawfully. You have no respect for the rule of law when powerful interests in US want to ignore it?
representativepress 4 years ago
You ask a loaded question. Mr. Miklaszewski suggests a military option remains on the table if "conditions should change and Iran posed a threat to the U.S. or its allies." He does not specify what those conditions may be. Heck, that could mean anything! Your choice of the term "war crimes" is as much a euphemism as Mr. M's term "military option" is a dysphemism. It's the old "if-by-whiskey" argument.
Anyways, I'd be interested to see his response (if he bothers to respond).
gldmj55 4 years ago
"Heck, that could mean anything! "
But it cannot be anything, the law makes it clear you cannot attack over "anything."
And you ignore the fact that Miklaszewski has sat back and said nothing about Bush's other illegal wars. I don't get what you are saying about "the term "war crimes" is as much a euphemism" It isn't a "euphemism"
representativepress 4 years ago
It reads to me like Miklaszewski was purposely being ambiguous with his wording "conditions could change" to imply there are scenarios in which military options will be considered. Those "conditions" could mean anything (for example, authorization from the U.N. to stop development of nuclear weapons at their facilities.).
I don't keep tabs on Mr. Miklaszewski and his journalism, so I can't assess his overall reporting on the wars. I am just looking at what you quoted in your video.
gldmj55 4 years ago
You live in the US, you don't see that mainstream media doesn't care to report about violations of international law when US officials are the violators?
His reporting ignores past violations, current violations and gives a free pass to future violations. LOOK at the body of work of MSM! Why are you tying to play it off like he isn't doing what I am saying he is doing? You are actually trying to say that maybe this guy does respect the rule of law to which the US is obligated? He never has.
representativepress 4 years ago