The MSS - 29 April 2012 - Part 1 - Stop the world! I want to get off.

Part 1
Stop the world! I want to get off.
http://youtu.be/U3bJL5kusuU

Part 2
Nothingness, word games and William Lane Craig
http://youtu.be/_jXIgAGeE_k

Part 3
Evolution = variation
http://youtu.be/HpRd8Mjs1rg

Part 4
Keeping Creationism off the curriculum.
http://youtu.be/IF95d6wWsq0

Part 5
Talking to theists.
http://youtu.be/DyF_qH9eWvQ

Part 6
I am right you because I say I am.
http://youtu.be/3SR5pFGWjwo

Part 7
Laws and theories.
http://youtu.be/7vJvu_b8w-w

Part 8
Atheism is a faith based rekigion.
http://youtu.be/_KntlH2KlsU


The Magic Sandwich Show website is here:
http://www.magicsandwichshow.com/
It is "work in progress" and we would like to hear your comments, ideas and criticisms.
You can use the "Contact Us" on the site to tell us your thoughts.

• Category

  Education

[getlostinadub]

Unfortunately, I have to agree with you.DPR was catering to sye and eric (at least that's what I felt),It was a waste of a chance to beat the irrationality out of the theistic new position of untruth and overall "I CANNOT be wrong" standpoint. Quite a shame after c0nc0rdance hyped his argument so much.

[getlostinadub]

Understand that I do agree with you and this reply is merely to show that everything you have said is accurate and further replies would be repetitive and a waste of text. What Rex is saying is true, whether you are a fanboy of any of these people or not.They had a chance to shut them down and they wasted it. Maybe if aron wasn't a nuke with a broken voice, or maybe if dpr wasn't constantly catering to eric and sye it would have been a better show...but "maybe" doesn't get you anywhere.

[YOSUP315]

The transcendental argument:

1. Induction is invalid

2. Induction can only be valid because... God

3. Induction is valid

4. Therefore bibleGod exists

Even if this argument proved God, how does it prove induction? It simply assumes induction, contradicting itself and unnecessarily adds in a God which explains the very premise they've already assumed. (I'll not be replying to comments because this T.A.G. shit get's really complex really fast and is unsuitable for comments with a 500 character lim

[timothy mostad]

All knowing god? unable to see how benificial a piece of paper is for recording facts. hammer and chisel/pencil and paper' God's Will' vs 'Human Rights'Servitude' vs 'Liberty'

'Faith' vs 'Reason'

'Chauvinism' vs 'Equality'

'Bigotry' vs 'Tolerance'

'Prejudice' vs 'Justice'

'Ignorance' vs 'Knowledge'

'Canon/Sharia Law' vs 'Due Process'

[steveb0503]

I believe the contraindication to their position comes in when you consider another facet of their whole reasoning chain - one they did not go into on your show (but did on Seth Andrew's - The Thinking Atheist) - wherein they assert that they can trust God's claims and base the rest of their epistemilogical model upon this assumption.

All one needs to do is point out something in the Bible that does not square with reality.

[Taconight965]

a mormon advertisement came on before i could watch this...

[kyebean]

This whole debate is facile. No one has to make unfounded assumptions. You don't have to assume your experience is not an illusion, you can accept that it might be an illusion and learn and live within it anyways. You don't have to assume your reasoning is sound, you can verify your reasoning against the reasoning of other minds and against your perception of reality. So you really don't need assumptions, but as far as assumptions go, "Yaweh exists" is one of the most ridiculous and unfounded.

[GreatPirateSolomon]

There were too many people involved for it to go anywhere interesting, DPR was catering a bit, but I think he did it in the hopes he could get them back again, hopefully with maybe just them, DPR, and c0n. As much as I love aron and tf00t, they get a little too excitable.

[osmosis321]

I like that Sye Ten rhymes with Satan.

[osmosis321]

what on earth are you yammering about?

[osmosis321]

You're right about one thing though, you're not just saying you can't be wrong, you're also committing a fallacy of begging the question, of assuming your conclusion as your premise.

[osmosis321]

"You can't even account for reasoning if you're consistent in your atheism since there can't be laws of logic or absolutes in an atheist universe"

This statement is just a load of bollocks which bears no resemblance to the atheist position. So there's your proof.