9/11 CONSPIRACY: Did the Global Hawk drones use Uranium?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Mar 3, 2007
With no evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon available to the public, some 9/11 researchers claim a DU tipped missile, launched by a weaponized UAV, like the Global Hawk, struck the Pentagon. The Global Hawk followed the missile into the building and was destroyed leaving behind only its most durable parts, such as the engine parts and parts of its landing gear.
Because DU is extremely dense, a wide variety of missiles in the U.S. arsenal are tipped with DU rods to penetrate the armored steel of military vehicles and buildings. Because uranium is a spontaneous pyrophoric material, it inflames when it reaches its target and generates such intense heat that it explodes. This is what causes the bright flash that is seen when a DU missile impacts upon its target.
The white flash seen in videos of the two planes striking the twin towers is exactly the kind of flash that occurs when a missile with a DU penetrator strikes. If DU penetrators caused the flashes seen on videos of the planes smashing into the towers, where did the uranium rods go?
Working with Hufschmid, AFP has located several photos that show a mysterious burning object passing through the initial explosion in the South Tower. This object, which displays the characteristics of a burning DU penetrator, can be seen on page 39 of Painful Questions.
The photo of the fireball that occurred immediately after the crash of the plane into the South Tower shows two fast moving objects that passed through the tower and are far ahead of the inferno. One appears as a black dot leaving a trail of white smoke; the second appears to be a dark rod burning with a white flame followed by a trail of black smoke.
The second object displays the characteristics of a burning DU penetrator. AFP sent enlarged photos of the object to Marion Fulk, a retired chemical physicist from the Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and asked him if this object could be DU.
"Yes, it is possible," Fulk said. Asked about the dark smoke trailing behind the nearly pure white flame, Fulk said, "It could be uranium oxide."
"Let's assume it is uranium," Fulk added. "It's burning near the surface and it's pretty hot." It is a small object with great mass and has huge momentum behind it, Fulk said. "It's way out ahead of the explosion and nothing stopped it."
If the object is a DU penetrator, that would explain its intense heat, radiation expert Leuren Moret told AFP. The DU would have already been burning before it hit the tower. The burning uranium would have acted to ignite the fuel in the aircraft causing the tremendous explosions seen in both towers. As it passed through the building some of the penetrator's kinetic energy would have been converted to heat energy.
The difference between the orange colors of the flames coming from the explosion in the tower and the white flame of the small dense object are indicative of "a huge temperature difference," Moret said. The white flame coming off of the uranium suggests it is burning at a very high temperature although it is not possible to determine the exact temperature from the photograph, according to Fulk and Moret.
The gap between the burning object and its dark smoke trail is because the vapor coming off of the burning object is very hot and has to cool in order to condense and form the visible dark colored uranium oxides, Moret said.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
5:50
New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside'by RTFeatured
1,117,655
-
6:09
9/11 Inside Job - The Most Damning Evidence Yet!by The 911 Media Psy-op
1,474,736 views
-
4:19
9/11 CONSPIRACY: ARE THESE PAINFUL QUESTIONS?by 911REICHSTAG
133,679 views
-
9:40
911 Clues EVERYONE MISSEDby antiklaus
2,782,587 views
-
5:14
9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show Youby 1Trainwreck
2,722,828 views
-
9/11 conspiracy theories
13,182 videos438
-
1:53
Strange things in 911 footage - look closelyby nwodetox
38,611,483 views
-
3:42
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11by Babylonsfalling
4,591,960 views
-
0:40
Only Aired Once About PENTAGON !!!by lulu7777
2,036,228 views
-
5:37
Did Flight 77 really hit the Pentagon on 911 (Part 2)?by muzicmaker2001
42,935 views
-
6:13
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1by muzicmaker2001
396,490 views
-
6:16
911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77by Mike Wilson
4,356,200 views
-
8:39
CNN on Jews Did 9/11by sxe
395,384 views
-
1:20:16
The Government's Top Secret Pursuit of Mystical Relics, Ancient Astronauts, and Lost Civilizationsby Russell Scott
5,827 views
-
2:30
Flight 93 Rare footage-never seen againby microserf2001
37,104 views
-
1:14
Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveillance Camera Video of Impactby foghaze
6,767,104 views
-
2:06
The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourselfby vinayakaya
2,981,426 views
-
0:35
Predator B v. Global Hawkby Sean Meade
173,553 views
-
1:10
Clinton slams 9/11 conspiracy hecklerby Alan Whitenton
447,445 views
-
0:54
Advanced technology or UFO Attack on 9-11 ?by The Global UFO Network
29,718 views
-
2:50:46
9-11 The Pentagon The Evidence & Conspiracy - Barbara Honegger Pdx 911 Truthby Anthony Hilder
17,712 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
stavlaft 3 years ago
those "eyewitnesses" get paid to lie you DUMBFUCK!!!! 60tons of aircraft, where da fuck are the wreck parts???? WHERE IS THE HOLE IN THE WALL?? WHERE ARE THE HUMAN REMAINS????? GO BACK TO SCHOOL YOU DIPSHIT
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
monzinator 2 years ago
Inside Job ! ....passenger planes dont melt away at crashes, but on 9-11 the rules of nature changed, a very special day for scientists and a worst day for democracy !
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (713)
acholidays 1 month ago
Well you cant cant get ti Those who did it, but we can slaughter their family members
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
poisonforlunch 5 months ago
okay...they lied their asses off....question is,...what are you gonna do about it?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
khadirmuse 7 months ago
American have none what so ever humanity. How can they kill thousands of human being? Use as an excuse to invade a muslim country.
When
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ben Benjamin 10 months ago
what about your rights that were stolen ... unlike you, I don't accept the loss of your rights even though you appear to probably be a poster for the offical propaganda spy machine!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ben Benjamin 10 months ago
OK mr expert, the body of the global hawk contains nothing that cannot be moved to install a missle warhead? You seem a bit testy when it's the govt itself that has treated us americans as terrorists for the past decade making them appear as they have something to hide ... You are a liar telling me that this aircraft cannot be fitted with a conventional warhead ... I don't know if your just covering up, or ignorant of mechanical engineering?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Heaney5551 10 months ago
No it can't fit a missile warhead.
Because there's no internal bay. There's no space. Even the camera itself is on the outside.
I really don't give a shit who stole your rights, I'm just telling you 9/11 was commited by 19 al-Qaeda operatives.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ben Benjamin 10 months ago
This drone can have it's camera systems removed and be fitted with a missle warhead inside ... you act as though modifications are impossible ... This govt stole our rights after 9-11, so please tell me why should I beleive their story when we are treated as terrorist by our own govt?
NO CRED POWER ... SORRY!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
thisvigilantguardian 10 months ago
I certainly don't agree a commercial airliner hit either, but if you're mainly going to use photographic evidence, do a better job. In the photo at 0:23, the whole bottom floor is obstructed by the foam spray of the fire truck. This is the floor in question! Just look at 0:17. Again at 0:37 it's obstructed. 0:43 the roof had already caved. This whole video lacks an unobstructed view of the bottom floor of the pentagon. Presenting it like this only works on people who don't do their own research.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
wikieditspam 1 year ago
No evidence available to the public? Thats just not true. The attacks were attempts at revenge against US actions overseas. Approximately 3000 people were murdered by suicidal thugs, and it is the fault of our government for continuing the imperialist "world policing" policies for provoking those sociopaths and the collective fault of the US citizens for condoning the sins of our chosen leaders. The Government just acted with poor judgement, but you're the ones that pay them.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fish5133 1 year ago
mixing known facts with a lot of unverifiable opinions. How come you know so much about a dog.Can you reference your statements. Just giving bullets to those who want to disbelieve that 911 was not as we were told. 3 towers designed to withstand aircraft hits do not all fall down like they did without some other force acting.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube