Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 CONSPIRACY: Did the Global Hawk drones use Uranium?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
65,068
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 3, 2007

With no evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon available to the public, some 9/11 researchers claim a DU tipped missile, launched by a weaponized UAV, like the Global Hawk, struck the Pentagon. The Global Hawk followed the missile into the building and was destroyed leaving behind only its most durable parts, such as the engine parts and parts of its landing gear.

Because DU is extremely dense, a wide variety of missiles in the U.S. arsenal are tipped with DU rods to penetrate the armored steel of military vehicles and buildings. Because uranium is a spontaneous pyrophoric material, it inflames when it reaches its target and generates such intense heat that it explodes. This is what causes the bright flash that is seen when a DU missile impacts upon its target.

The white flash seen in videos of the two planes striking the twin towers is exactly the kind of flash that occurs when a missile with a DU penetrator strikes. If DU penetrators caused the flashes seen on videos of the planes smashing into the towers, where did the uranium rods go?

Working with Hufschmid, AFP has located several photos that show a mysterious burning object passing through the initial explosion in the South Tower. This object, which displays the characteristics of a burning DU penetrator, can be seen on page 39 of Painful Questions.

The photo of the fireball that occurred immediately after the crash of the plane into the South Tower shows two fast moving objects that passed through the tower and are far ahead of the inferno. One appears as a black dot leaving a trail of white smoke; the second appears to be a dark rod burning with a white flame followed by a trail of black smoke.

The second object displays the characteristics of a burning DU penetrator. AFP sent enlarged photos of the object to Marion Fulk, a retired chemical physicist from the Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and asked him if this object could be DU.

"Yes, it is possible," Fulk said. Asked about the dark smoke trailing behind the nearly pure white flame, Fulk said, "It could be uranium oxide."

"Let's assume it is uranium," Fulk added. "It's burning near the surface and it's pretty hot." It is a small object with great mass and has huge momentum behind it, Fulk said. "It's way out ahead of the explosion and nothing stopped it."

If the object is a DU penetrator, that would explain its intense heat, radiation expert Leuren Moret told AFP. The DU would have already been burning before it hit the tower. The burning uranium would have acted to ignite the fuel in the aircraft causing the tremendous explosions seen in both towers. As it passed through the building some of the penetrator's kinetic energy would have been converted to heat energy.

The difference between the orange colors of the flames coming from the explosion in the tower and the white flame of the small dense object are indicative of "a huge temperature difference," Moret said. The white flame coming off of the uranium suggests it is burning at a very high temperature although it is not possible to determine the exact temperature from the photograph, according to Fulk and Moret.

The gap between the burning object and its dark smoke trail is because the vapor coming off of the burning object is very hot and has to cool in order to condense and form the visible dark colored uranium oxides, Moret said.

  • likes, 52 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • those "eyewitnesses" get paid to lie you DUMBFUCK!!!! 60tons of aircraft, where da fuck are the wreck parts???? WHERE IS THE HOLE IN THE WALL?? WHERE ARE THE HUMAN REMAINS????? GO BACK TO SCHOOL YOU DIPSHIT

  • 2 words for you sheep: Operation Northwoods.  Read up and ask yourself "Does this sound like 9/11"? Would our government stage a terrorist attack to have a pretext for war? And we still haven't found Osama Bin Laden after 9 years? WMD in Iraq? Nope

see all

All Comments (696)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "launched by a weaponized UAV, like the Global Hawk"

    The Global Hawk is not a weaponized UAV. You have some facts wrong.

  • @leadzhead Opperation Northwoods... oh I get it! The fact that the government was willing to FAKE the deaths of 4 colledge students means that they're willing to ACCUALLY KILL 3000 people. That makes PERFECT sence.

  • :D

    You guys are hilarious!

    How can you be so stupid idiots?

    Cant you see?

    It was the aliens who did this.

    Fucking ignorant sheep...

  • give my 5:02 ass hole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-@

  • @stavlaft thank you. common sense seems to be a rare commodity these days. are people really so stupid? if so, i think we're doomed. this piece of crap is going to turn out like JFK, remember? but unlike JFK, in which the only "eyewitness" account of the murder was the Zapruder film which didn't go public for 12 YEARS!. this is right in front of the public's eyes. all they have to do is open them. the WTC 1 & 2 are blown to kingdom come. WTF. Planes going right thru steel. it's just stupid.

  • @michaeljfo The people in the photos are the ones who were inside the Pentagon that died. It was a fucking missile.

  • @stavlaft EXACTLY someone comes to you with 500 million Federal Reserve Notes and you'll have no problem saying a quick line or two. Plus the money is easily printed and how would we know its been printed? we dont and thats why its so simple

  • People on the inside of The Pentagon were killed and therefor dead bodies.No passengers or crew were ever found.The lies which identifies passengers can not be substantiated,especially Barbara Olsen.I wonder what really happenned to them.Ted Olsen is either going along or is delusional.

  • If terrorist can cause this much death and distruction in one day with 4 planes, why have they not done it again in the last 10 years. So much about Sept 11 just doesn't add up. Will we ever know the truth or at least see the evidence on which the government based its offical story.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more