Photographing Children with Candice Stringham
Top Comments
All Comments (37)
-
Ithreemafia, you have no clue either. I seen your poor reviews of the sigma. You choose it over the tamron because it looked nicer. What a clown. You are no pro, I wish you'd stop making useless reviews.
-
The only amateurs here are the ones swearing in their replies. This lens is optically superior to the sigma and canon. It's barely slower too. God help you people if you ever have to manual focus. Relying on fast af is for amateurs.
-
she says fast lens,not fast focus...fucking amatures!
-
fking slow!!
-
i heard the sigma 70-200 HSM II was better
-
Too slow for me at least
-
My humble opinion but it seems that at 1:57 the child's face is washed out or the white balance looks inaccurate.
-
makes nice pictures but a little slow...and i accidentaly broke one. darn,good thing i catched it! hehe... although it is awesome for portraitures.
Tamron has slower focus speed but optical quality is better than Canon 70-200 L. I don't know about Nikkor but this Tamron is a really good piece of the lens! When You will learn the focus You can take sharp photos of fast moving vehicles like cars, motobikes and planes without problem. Optics in this camera are great! Comparing to photos from Canon 70-200 L lens there is less flaring, better picture quality-really sharp and it costs 2X less than L. For me Tamron was a great choice!!!
Dessper23 1 year ago 3
He means af.
It's bizzare that there isn't a proprietry hsm in this lens as tamron had to add an in lens motor for canon and nikon for the non screw drive lower end cameras.
IMHO Tamron are lazy with af. The 18-250 Sony takes 1/2 to 1/3 of the turns that the Tamron 18-250 does to infinity focus.
Graynven 2 years ago 2