Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Atheist's Nightmare - God's Magic Banana Factory

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
20,928
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2007

Nick Gisburne's classic analysis of Ray Comfort's use of a banana to prove the existence of God.

Impossible as it may be to believe, this is even funnier than the original.

http://www.gisburne.com/

This video is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 License.

  • likes, 32 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Well OBVIOUSLY the pineapple is an ungodly fruit which we were not supposed to eat

  • So I guess you could say the banana is indeed intelligently designed - by farmers. ;)

see all

All Comments (410)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Choochlyman hmmm, obvious examples of evolution. The entire collection of canine breeds. And i'm only talking about dogs. If evolution doesn't exist, then how were we able to create such a variety ranging from little Chihuahua to massive Saint Bernard. This is a man generated evolution (aka selective breeding) rather than natural evolution, but none the less: Evolution. In Natural Evolution, it involves survival traits instead.

  • lol, my answer is to the banana arguement involves digestive enzymes and plant cell's cell-walls.

  • God wants us to fuck our hands with bananas? o.O Oh my... Not to mention they're made for easy entry of the mouth.... you sick mother fuckers!

  • I watched the first minute of this guy and had to stop. He's so snarky and condescending, it literally makes ya nauseous.

  • im hungry for a bannana

  • all athiests will be sorry for wat they saw. and all will bow to the lord for he is your god. u will have no mercy on u

  • @Choochlyman (Not Semaphore, but your stupidity fascinates me.) CHALLENGE ACCEPTED! In chronological order: Australopithecus anamensis; Australopithecus garhi; Homo gautengensis; Homo habilis; Homo georgicus; Homo ergaster; Homo erectus (Peking Man); Homo antecessor; Homo erectus; Homo sapiens (this one's us).

  • @Choochlyman

    You should be able to find images for most of these on google. I know you're probably going to claim that they are all either humans or apes, or that they're faked. In which case, what's the evidence for your claims? - Sahelanthropus tchadensis - Australopithecus ramidus - Australopithecus afarensis - Australopithecus africanus - Australopithecus sediba - Australopithecus aethiopicus - Australopithecus robustus - Homo habilis - Homo georgicus - Homo erectus

  • @semaphore1842 Fine. Show me a transitional fossil between an ape and a human then.

  • @Choochlyman

    Every fossil is a transitional form between two different beings. However creationists in their ignorance refuses to understand what transitional forms, or the fact that lack of any given transitional form is essentially meaningless as to whether evolution is correct or not.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more