@fatdan172501 Sometimes it's very lol to be literal. You were right about the dumb and lazy bit, though. The richer we get, the more apparent it becomes.
@fatdan172501 Half of those people would have to live in deserts, salt plains, on vertical slopes in the Andes, on floodlands, marshes and farmland. The infrastructure required to get everybody to their five acres would cover a quarter of the continent and cost the global GNP several times over. Also, they'd have to fight the locals first, then each other, as nobody would want five acres of volcano, salt or mosquito infested bog. In the end a few ruthless individuals would own everything.
... less people is a given already.
withindarkness 1 month ago
@velour99 Yeah :)
jannevellamo 2 months ago
There literally isn't the room on this planet for everyone to live like this. Less people, or more room, or compromise.
velour99 2 months ago
@jannevellamo Just like now.
velour99 2 months ago
People this s the future..
anuskransje 4 months ago
4:00 see the size of the spider?/
mochababy2 10 months ago
@jannevellamo true words true words.
fatdan172501 11 months ago
@fatdan172501 Sometimes it's very lol to be literal. You were right about the dumb and lazy bit, though. The richer we get, the more apparent it becomes.
jannevellamo 11 months ago
@jannevellamo your taking the statment way to literal lol. im just saying there is plenty enough land to go around.
fatdan172501 11 months ago
@fatdan172501 Half of those people would have to live in deserts, salt plains, on vertical slopes in the Andes, on floodlands, marshes and farmland. The infrastructure required to get everybody to their five acres would cover a quarter of the continent and cost the global GNP several times over. Also, they'd have to fight the locals first, then each other, as nobody would want five acres of volcano, salt or mosquito infested bog. In the end a few ruthless individuals would own everything.
jannevellamo 11 months ago