9/11: Building WTC7 Compilation

jews

You know Edward, it occurs to me that if you can look at WTC7 videos and rationalize that fire took that building down, then your faith in the establishment is just too strong, nothing I can tell you is going to change your mind.

So, you are correct, fire and debris damage are the cause of the collapse.

Don't forget to vote and pay your taxes.

>your faith in the establishment is just too strong

Bet you'd be surprised to learn I was a Truther once, too. I realized it was all B.S. because nothing added up. Speaking of, you still haven't explained why the exterior didn't light up like a Christmas tree. You believe hundreds of incendiaries went off along each face, burning at 4500 degrees F and vaporizing huge steel columns in less than a second, yet not so much as a spark can be seen. Now, why would that be?

Oh yeah. I'm still interested in learning how thermate is used by the military to demolish buildings. You said, "the millitary has been using thermites and thermates the these purposes for decades now." Where did you hear that...I'd like to check it out.

# Oh yeah. I'm still interested in learning how
# thermate is used by the military to demolish
# buildings.

I never said the military used it for buildings, just that the military has been using it for a long time, for demolition purposes as well as welding purposes.

en(dot)wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/ Thermite

# Bet you'd be surprised to learn I was a Truther
# once, too.

Yup, I would be surprised, in fact, I wouldn't believe you.

# Now, why would that be?

Cuz fire took down that building, fire and gravity alone, there was no molten steel and there was no thermates and if a chair is really heavy and tall, it will always go straight down at free fall speed.
Gubment would never do this to it's own people.

Now go away.

Oh, you disappoint. Instead of being sarcastic, you could have revealed that they used DARK-super-nano-thermate, which gives off incredible heat but no light -- a substance so mysterious, it's never been written about or discussed until now. This would be the final piece in the puzzle to explain why the three largest buildings that ever collapsed didn't collapse exactly the way you imagine they should have. Dark super nanothermate...it explains everything.
Okay now! Buh-bye.

Sarcastic? Me?
Bro, I'm agreeing with you, fire and debris damage from the towers really did cause the collapse of WTC7.

You said it yourself:
"The collapse looks exactly as it would if a very tall, large building suffered a critical failure that began at a single point"

How does agreeing with you constitute sarcasm?

Were YOU sarcastic when you wrote that the collapse looks like a fire collapse? Or were you serious?

> Okay now! Buh-bye

Yup, and don't forget to pay your taxes.

@pepelapiu2004

I think George Orwell had it right. There is an astounding amount of "doublethink" necessary to buy into the government's BS.

3rd - No real detonations visible anywhere at the top. This indicates that the shell was demolished from the bottom up, as each floor comes to the ground, it is detonated. This would explain why no detonations are visible at the top, but a large pyroclastic cloud forms at the base as seen at 03:21 , at 03:52 , and at 04:03

Or you can just keep believing that fire at random was the culprid.