Viking battle (part 1)
Top Comments
All Comments (78)
-
@lou0kang ok
-
@lou0kang ahahaaha that tv program is horrible! the "viking" man who was fighting in the video of deadliest warriors had done all wrong! vikings didn't fight like him
-
@lou0kang Which we all know is a show based on 100% historical scientific fact....*cough*
-
this cool also take a look at some SCA combat,some of you may find it interesting
-
teh vikings are good but didn't win the title of the deadliest warrior because the samurai's defeated them on the deadliest warrior tv show
-
do u call it battle...?
-
I have to join Joms soon..been a viking reenactor for yars with a small group but these guys are top.
-
@ joonte1010
They also came from Dublin .
lol.
-
Man, I wish I was there
-
Kievan Rus - of course, but Kiev itself was founded circa 5th century.
I didnt say there were no Vikings in York, I would be stupid to claim so. I just say it is ingorance writing that York was founded by Vikings. As it is written @ historyofyork:
"Yorks history truly begins with the Romans. The city was founded in about AD 71 when the 5,000 men of the Ninth Legion marched from Lincoln and set up camp. Eboracum, as the Romans called York, was born".
omg vikings pwn everything from ninjas to spartans!!!!
bragonfly 4 years ago 8
lol tard, they didnt move, they expanded. There is a difference.
6StringWarrior 3 years ago 6